Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Tells Supporters He’ll Defy Any Protective Order Issued in Jan. 6 Case

If he follows through on his promise, Trump could be found in contempt of court.

Former President Donald Trump speaks as the keynote speaker at the 56th Annual Silver Elephant Dinner hosted by the South Carolina Republican Party on August 5, 2023, in Columbia, South Carolina.

During a campaign event in New Hampshire on Tuesday, former President Donald Trump promised his supporters that he would not abide by any protective order imposed by a federal judge in the case involving his attempts to overturn the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

A protective order would bar Trump and his lawyers from disclosing certain kinds of evidence publicly, specifically evidence that could be used to intimidate witnesses or that could otherwise negatively affect the fairness of the case. Although protective orders are not uncommon, Trump has errantly suggested that such an order would violate his First Amendment right to free speech.

In comments on Tuesday, Trump insinuated that President Joe Biden was directing special counsel Jack Smith to pursue the protective order, echoing unfounded claims he’s made in the past that the case against him is politically motivated. Trump has not provided any evidence to back up these claims.

“Crooked Joe now wants the thug prosecutor, this deranged guy, to file a court order taking away my First Amendment rights so that I can’t speak…I will talk about it. I will,” Trump told the audience gathered before him.

The request from Smith and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to have a protective order placed on evidence in the case came as Trump made comments last week that appeared to be a threat against those considering cooperating with the investigation. On Friday, Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social website, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!”

That post was included by prosecutors — alongside other arguments — as a reason why Trump should be barred from sharing evidence in a public setting, as his doing so could have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case,” the DOJ said in its filing.

Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case, scheduled arguments over the request for a protective order for Friday. In her announcement of the date for those arguments, Chutkan indicated that she recognized Trump would likely seek to “publicly disseminate, and publicize in the media, various materials obtained from the Government in discovery.”

Chutkan also dismissed claims by Trump’s legal team that a protective order would stifle his speech rights.

“There is no right to publicly release discovery material, because the discovery process is designed to ensure a fair process before the Court, not to provide the defendant an opportunity to improperly press his case in the court of public opinion,” the judge said.

In an interview with NPR, Mark MacDougall, an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law School, agreed that Trump’s speech rights wouldn’t be violated with a protective order.

“It’s not a gag order and would not restrict him from talking about almost anything,” MacDougall explained. “He just could not use the evidence produced by the government to support those statements.”

Still, once Chutkan makes her decision on the protective order, it could lead to the first instance of Trump’s lawyers in the case appealing a decision from the judge, as they could argue, if the order is imposed, that it violates Trump’s constitutional rights. That appeal would go to the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals; if Trump’s legal team still isn’t satisfied with the outcome, it could be further appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Such appeals would likely be an attempt to delay on the part of Trump and his lawyers. By questioning each technical order handed out, Trump makes it more likely that his trial will take place after the 2024 election.

Trump is running for the GOP nomination for the third time in as many election cycles; if he manages to win next fall, it could mean he would no longer have to go to trial. As president, Trump could appoint a new attorney general, who could decide to drop all federal charges against him — in both this case and the Mar-a-Lago government documents case.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.