President Trump made false assertions on Monday regarding the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish, insinuating that her request to have her successor named after the election was crafted by leading Democrats in Congress.
The president did not provide any evidence to back up his claim.
Trump made the statement during an interview on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” program while discussing Ginsburg’s passing over the weekend. When one of the hosts mentioned the late justice’s wish, Trump appeared to be flummoxed by it, falsely alleging that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer or Rep. Adam Schiff fabricated Ginsburg’s words.
“I don’t know that she said that, or was that written out by Adam Schiff and Schumer and Pelosi? I would be more inclined to the second, okay?” Trump said.
“I mean, maybe she did and maybe she didn’t,” the president added.
The “Fox & Friends” hosts did not challenge Trump to provide any support for his claims.
Ginsburg, a liberal stalwart on the high court whose judicial opinions and scathing dissents inspired countless individuals, dictated her final wish to her granddaughter, Clara Spera, just a few days before her dying from metastatic cancer of the pancreas.
“My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed,” Ginsburg said.
Within hours of her passing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) announced that he would immediately push for a vote and confirmation on a Trump nominee to succeed Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump announced his intention the morning after her death to nominate her replacement, setting up a timeline to announce a nominee by next weekend.
This timeline would allow for just 39 days until Election Day for the Senate to confirm his choice. Since 1975, the average timespan for confirmation to the high court has been around 70 days
The plan by Senate Republicans and Trump to rush a successor to Ginsburg has been widely recognized as hypocritical, as Senate Republicans in 2016 had blocked President Barack Obama’s nominee, federal Judge Merrick Garland, to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia, claiming it was inappropriate to nominate a successor eight months out from that year’s presidential race.
Trump was lambasted on social media for his cold and baseless comments on Ginsburg’s final wish.
“I’m sure it won’t upset Ginsburg’s grieving family at all that her dying wish as dictated to her granddaughter is now being called a Democratic hoax by the president of the United States,” CNN anchor Jake Tapper said on Twitter.
Amy Spitalnick, executive director of Integrity First for America, said it was shameful that Trump made such a claim.
“First McConnell is talking about the Senate vote within an hour of her death. Now Trump is smearing her family’s statement upon her death as a hoax,” Spitalnick tweeted. “There is no bottom.”
Former Clinton White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart derided the Fox News network for failing to hold Trump accountable during the interview. “Trump claimed on your air this morning that it was a Democratic hoax dreamed up by Adam Schiff,” Lockhart said, directing his comments toward the Fox News hosts. “And your journalists just sat there and never said a word.”
“The President called RBG’s granddaughter a liar on national television,” Lockhart added in a second tweet. “Does anyone really want four more years of this?”
Benjamin Wittes, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institute, shined a light on Trump’s callousness.
“The chance that Clara Spera would make up her grandmother’s dying wish is roughly the same as the chance that our president would refrain from causing pain to the family with a display of mendacity at this particular moment,” Wittes wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.