Over the weekend, President-elect Donald Trump expressed a desire to end birthright citizenship — a right conferred to every individual born in the United States — through executive order, an action that would be in violation of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Trump made his comments during an interview with NBC “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker. When asked if ending birthright citizenship through an executive order was still a day-one plan for him upon reentering the White House, Trump responded by saying “absolutely.”
Welker challenged Trump on the legality of his proposal, noting that an executive order from a president cannot supersede provisions found in the Constitution. Trump responded that, if his order isn’t successful, he’d push for other ways to end birthright citizenship.
“We’re going to have to get it changed, we maybe have to go back to the people, but we have to end it,” Trump said in his remarks, wrongly adding that the U.S. is “the only country that has” birthright citizenship.
In fact, around three dozen countries around the world — including most in the Western Hemisphere — have birthright citizenship enshrined as law within their jurisdictions.
Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right, according to the first clause of the 14th Amendment, which was passed at the end of the Civil War. It reads:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Although passed in large part to ensure that formerly enslaved Black Americans would receive the same rights as white citizens, the 14th Amendment also sought to ensure that all future residents born in the country would receive such rights, consistent with Lincolnesque Republicans’ views on immigration at the time.
Republicans today, however, including Trump, are openly advocating for getting rid of birthright citizenship, despite the fact that most in the U.S. are largely supportive of it remaining the law of the land. Legal experts say that Trump cannot undo birthright citizenship simply through a stroke of his pen, and that an entirely new constitutional amendment would be required to change the standard. Any attempt to undo birthright citizenship — short of an effort to change the Constitution itself — would undoubtedly be countered with legal challenges.
“Birthright citizenship is not a policy choice, it is a constitutional imperative,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, a civil rights lawyer and former president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. “It can no more be signed away by Executive Order than the First Amendment.”
Within the same interview, Trump was asked what his administration planned to do about “mixed status” families — families living in the U.S. that include both citizens and undocumented immigrants. Under his policies, Trump said, all could be deported, including those who have attained citizenship status.
“I don’t want to be breaking up families,” Trump claimed, despite the fact that his previous administration implemented the notoriously cruel family separation policy at the border. “So the only way you don’t break up the family is you keep them together and you have to send them all back.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.