Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Trump Hotel Unlawfully “Restraining and Coercing” Las Vegas Culinary Workers

Trump International has already been slapped with charges by federal officials over alleged unfair labor practices.

Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. Trump International has been slapped with charges by federal officials over alleged unfair labor practices. (Photo: Eric Huang)

Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.

The National Labor Relations Board alleged that the hotel company of Republican presidential primary front-runner Donald Trump “has been interfering with, restraining and coercing” the rights of its workers in Las Vegas.

The complaint, issued last week by the NLRB, said Trump International Hotel offered sweetheart deals to employees who rejected a unionization drive and retaliated against two workers who supported the initiative. The successful union drive was led by the Culinary Workers Union Local 226.

“Specifically, the complaint alleges that a hotel labor consultant told employees last year that the Culinary would not help them and said ‘it would be futile for them to select the union as their bargaining representative,'” VEGAS INC reported. The filing also said Trump International guaranteed “job opportunities to transfer to different positions” in exchange for opposition to unionization.

The NLRB also found that Trump International “terminated a certain employee and did not transfer another one to a full-time server job” because of pro-union activities.

Federal law grants workers “the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.”

The Culinary Union noted that Trump International has already been slapped with charges by federal officials over alleged unfair labor practices. Prior complaints involved: the limiting of workers’ ability to communicate; surveillance and interrogations; “intimidation of employees by Trump management and security staff, including a manager physically pushing employees,” and other disciplinary actions in retaliation for pro-union activity.

Last week’s complaint will be adjudicated on April 12 by an administrative law judge. Jill Martin, the Trump Organization’s assistant general counsel told VEGAS INC that “the allegations in the complaint are completely without merit and we look forward to proving that at a hearing.”

The Culinary Union noted that Trump International has previously settled two NLRB complaints over unfair labor practices, striking one deal in 2014 and another last year.

“Despite these obstacles to a free and fair union election, a majority of workers at the Trump Las Vegas voted to unionize in a NLRB election held December 4-5, 2015,” it said.

Trump International challenged the validity of the vote — a motion overruled by the NLRB in February. Hotel managers had accused Culinary Union supporters of “coercing workers and improperly influencing the outcome”— charges they themselves will face next month.

Donald Trump has said throughout his campaign that his industrial management experience as a businessman should help him with pro-labor voters — at least relatively-speaking, for a Republican.

“Manhattan is a hundred percent — you’re building a building, it’s essentially a hundred percent union,” he said in early February. “So I’ve worked with unions over the years. I’ve done very well with unions.”

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.

It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.

If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.