Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump-Appointed Judge Could Impose Extreme Restrictions on Abortion Meds

Upending access to medication would be “devastating for abortion care,” one abortion rights activist said.

A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump could upend decades of policy on abortion medication, reversing the loosening of restrictions made in the past year and potentially outlawing the drug altogether.

Federal District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, who is based in Texas, will soon decide on a lawsuit brought forward by the far right legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which alleges that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of mifepristone in 2000 was illegal and that the drug was not tested thoroughly enough. The ADF — which seeks to have the drug made illegal — claims in its lawsuit, filed in November, that the federal agency “failed America’s women and girls” by approving the drug too quickly.

Legal experts and medical professionals largely agree that this is incorrect. Greer Donley, an associate professor at the University of Pittsburgh who is an expert in FDA-related law, has noted that the abortion medication was “rigorously” reviewed before it was approved.

“In fact, many argue the FDA has actually been largely overprotective and restrictive when it comes to mifepristone, so it’s a bit ironic that these onerous regulations around the drug are being used as evidence of leniency,” Donley told The Guardian regarding the legal merits of the case.

Observers believe it’s unlikely that Kacsmaryk will leave in place Biden’s executive orders and the FDA’s recent actions loosening restrictions on abortion medication — and many fear he may go further, granting the ADF’s request to undo the FDA’s approval of mifepristone from decades ago.

Kacsmaryk, who was nominated by Trump in 2017, is a member of the far right Federalist Society, and has worked for First Liberty Institute, a far right group that promotes a conservative Christian agenda through legal actions. He has twice ruled that the Biden administration must keep in place the anti-immigrant “Remain in Mexico” policy that Trump implemented as president.

“At some point, Kacsmaryk will issue an order concerning the legality of a very common abortion drug,” wrote Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser. “And, if Kacsmaryk behaves as he has in past cases, the scope of that order will be limited only by his own desires and ambitions.”

The Biden administration has pledged to appeal any decision that further restricts abortion medication. But since the case is in the jurisdiction of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (deemed the most conservative in the country), it’s unlikely an appeal could be won in that arena, or that an injunction would be placed on Kacsmaryk’s eventual ruling. After the Fifth Circuit decides on the case, it can only be appealed to the Supreme Court, where conservative justices have handed down numerous anti-abortion rulings, most notably in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health case last summer, which upended federal abortion protections that had been in place since 1973.

Abortion rights advocates have expressed concern about the case. At least two groups that help Americans obtain abortion medication from other countries — Aid Access and Plan C — have encouraged people in the U.S. to stockpile abortion medication before they become pregnant, in case they need it in the future.

Andrea Miller, president of the National Institute for Reproductive Health, has said that a ruling from Kacsmaryk could be “devastating for abortion care.”

“Cutting off critical access to abortion medication — which is the preferred method for more than half of abortion patients in the country — would cause significant harm, especially at a time when Dobbs has made it difficult or impossible for many to get care at clinics,” Miller said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy