Just as this administration’s commitment to caring for the environment is poor, its commitment to working toward environmental justice may be lax at best.
The Trump administration inherited an interagency working group on environmental justice — 16 agencies that are supposed to work to address “the disproportionately high distribution of health and environmental risks among low-income and minority communities by seeking their fair treatment and meaningful involvement in environmental policy.”
The nonpartisan General Accountability Office (GAO) was asked to review those environmental justice efforts but found them lacking.
The working group doesn’t just include agencies that directly deal with the environment, such as the Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It also includes agencies such as the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and more. Each agency is supposed to provide a yearly progress report explaining what actions they’ve taken to address environmental justice.
During the Obama era, nearly all agencies filed those reports. Since Trump took office, though, that number has plummeted to only four agencies filing the required reports for 2017. Many agencies also haven’t updated their environmental justice strategic plans. The Department of Commerce even went so far as to say it simply hasn’t updated that plan because it would take too much time and resources.
Even in previous administrations, the work of a group that spans multiple agencies was sometimes difficult to quantify. However, the GAO noted, one of the best ways for it to determine whether progress was being made was simply for the agencies to file their yearly progress reports. That would seem like a relatively noncontroversial option, but only in an administration that valued the environment and environmental justice. Under Trump, several agencies are outright refusing the GAO’s recommendation of yearly reports.
For example, the Department of Transportation (DOT) stated it would only commit to providing reports “when it determines that the circumstances of its activities so warrant.” DOT’s activities, though, should also warrant a report. Impoverished communities are often surrounded by freeways, leading to far higher amounts of diesel air pollution.
Similarly, the Department of Education under Secretary Betsy DeVos has refused to commit because the agency “does not believe this is the most appropriate course of action for the department or an efficient use of resources.” That’s because even though schools in poor and minority communities are often demonstrably less safe in terms of what students may be exposed to, the Department of Education lacks authority to regulate much of that, as it is addressed at the state level. However, as the GAO points out, a new strategic plan would help Education guide its future environmental justice activities, presumably within the scope of their authority.
It’s telling that some agencies under Trump don’t even feel like they need to update the public as to their efforts to close the environmental justice gap, but given the administration’s notorious disregard for the environment generally, it isn’t surprising.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.