Skip to content Skip to footer

Tokyo Olympics Social Media Teams Are Forbidden From Showing Athletes Kneeling

The ban was brought on by the decision of women’s soccer teams earlier this week to kneel in protest against racism.

Britain's forward Georgia Stanway, left, and midfielder Keira Walsh take a knee before the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games women's group E first round football match between Great Britain and Chile at the Sapporo Dome in Sapporo on July 21, 2021.

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.

Individuals who are managing the social media channels for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and Tokyo 2020 organizers are reportedly being banned from posting content that shows athletes taking part in any kind of political demonstration during the summer games.

Social media teams for this year’s Olympics were delivered a message on Tuesday evening telling them they cannot share optics of athletes taking a knee, The Guardian reported, citing a source familiar with the communications.

The order to not share such imagery, even in instances where there appears to be agreement to take part in the protest by all athletes involved, came after a women’s soccer match earlier this week in which players from Great Britain and Chile both kneeled prior to the game’s start. Later in the day, other teams took similar actions, including Team USA and Sweden ahead of their own contest. The players had all taken a knee to show their opposition to racism.

Images of the players kneeling were broadcast around the world on live television, but the Tokyo 2020 live blog did not publish any pictures of it happening. That organization, as well as the social media teams for the IOC, didn’t publish any images of the acts of protest later on.

The refusal to show athletes demonstrating for a political cause comes after the IOC decided to relax its controversial Rule 50, which had banned players from making any “political, religious or racial” demonstrations at all during the games. Such protests are now allowed so long as they’re not disruptive and show respect to fellow competitors. However, the IOC still plans to sanction players if they conduct any demonstrations while standing during medal ceremonies.

Before revising Rule 50, the rule had been justified by the IOC as being necessary to “ensure that each and every athlete can experience the Olympic Games without any divisive disruption.” But critics assailed the rule, calling it an undue restriction of athletes’ free speech rights and of being racist in nature.

“The Olympic podium is a media of communication to the world, and the Olympic frontier cannot be a barrier to human rights,” a statement from a progressive athlete start-up movement called Global Athlete said earlier this year.

Color of Change, a racial justice organization, also criticized Rule 50, saying its bans on kneeling or other forms of protest (including the wearing of “Black Lives Matter” shirts) were “a direct assault on the free expression of Black athletes by a commission that includes no Black members.”

The revision to Rule 50, which is called Rule 50.2, is still being criticized by many as being an unfair restriction of athletes’ right to free speech.

“Freedom of expression is an enabling right, facilitating the exercise of other human rights,” wrote Nikki Dryden, a human rights lawyer and board co-chair of the Centre for Sport and Human Rights in Geneva, in a recent opinion piece on the issue. “For women and minority Olympians, the IOC has additional positive obligations to ensure their voices and opinions are heard. Once they have earned their Olympic power on the field, there is a lot to gain from the international spotlight provided during the medal ceremony.”

A terrifying moment. We appeal for your support.

In the last weeks, we have witnessed an authoritarian assault on communities in Minnesota and across the nation.

The need for truthful, grassroots reporting is urgent at this cataclysmic historical moment. Yet, Trump-aligned billionaires and other allies have taken over many legacy media outlets — the culmination of a decades-long campaign to place control of the narrative into the hands of the political right.

We refuse to let Trump’s blatant propaganda machine go unchecked. Untethered to corporate ownership or advertisers, Truthout remains fearless in our reporting and our determination to use journalism as a tool for justice.

But we need your help just to fund our basic expenses. Over 80 percent of Truthout’s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors.

Truthout has launched a fundraiser to add 500 new monthly donors in the next 9 days. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger one-time gift, Truthout only works with your support.