Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Demands Supreme Court Block New York Judge’s Hush Money Sentencing Date

Trump’s legal team claims that the sentencing would be a “burden” on him as he prepares to become president.

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to members of the media during a press conference at the Mar-a-Lago Club on January 7, 2025, in Palm Beach, Florida.

The legal team for president-elect Donald Trump has submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court, urging justices to prevent a sentencing hearing from being held later this week in a New York state-based case involving his attempts to subvert public notice filings during the 2016 presidential race.

Trump was convicted on May 30, 2024, in a case relating to his hush money payments to an adult film actress. Trump falsified business records from his company, the Trump Organization, to make reimbursements to his then-lawyer Michael Cohen to hide the payments in the run-up to Election Day 2016.

By falsifying those documents, Trump avoided having to include the hush money payments in Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings, which requires every election-related expenditure to be documented. In New York State, it is illegal to falsify business records to facilitate another crime.

A jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts relating to these actions. However, Trump appealed the ruling and the subsequent post-trial decisions after being found guilty, delaying his actual sentencing in the case up until now.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, who has overseen the case, planned to hold a sentencing hearing on January 10 that required Trump’s presence (either in person or electronically). Merchan has explained that he doesn’t intend to sentence Trump to jail time or probation, but that issuing a ruling of any kind means the case is completed, and that Trump will enter office with the record of being the only president ever convicted of a felony.

Trump sought to block the hearing date in state appellate courts. Earlier this week, an appellate judge denied his motion to delay the sentencing, leading to his legal team submitting an attempt to the U.S. Supreme Court instead on Wednesday.

It’s rare, although not exceptionally so, for the Supreme Court to intervene in state matters. In their legal brief, Trump’s lawyers argue that requiring Trump to deal with the sentencing is unfair as he prepares to become the next president.

“Forcing President Trump to prepare for a criminal sentencing in a felony case while he is preparing to lead the free world as President of the United States in less than two weeks imposes an intolerable, unconstitutional burden on him that undermines these vital national interests,” the brief to the Supreme Court states.

Trump is also claiming that, as president-elect, he’s now entitled to newly expanded presidential immunity standards relating to criminal processes. If this argument is agreed to by the Supreme Court, it would expand already expansive immunity protections to apply to state courts as well as federal, and to be given to individuals who are not yet president.

The court has given prosecutors in New York until Thursday morning to respond to Trump’s complaint, though they will likely do so sooner. Any action by the court must be made before Friday’s sentencing hearing.

Contrary to the president-elect’s legal arguments, the action by Merchan would have little-to-no impact on Trump’s ability to prepare himself to become president, particularly since he can attend remotely. Trump has also attended non-work-related gatherings at his Mar-a-Lago estate, and has demonstrated that he can take part in other activities without them interfering with his preparatory governmental work, quashing the argument that this is too much of a burden for him.

It’s unclear, however, what move the Supreme Court may take from here. Already granting him huge (and unprecedented) leeway as a former president, the court’s 6-3 conservative majority (which includes three members appointed by Trump himself) may entertain his legal team’s unusual and questionable claims.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy