Skip to content Skip to footer

Tlaib: Meta’s Taxes Would Drop From 25 Percent to -2 Percent Under New Tax Bill

Congressional leaders are working on a bipartisan tax bill that would hand tax cuts to corporations and the rich.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib speaks at a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol Building on September 19, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Progressive Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) has announced that she is opposed to the bipartisan tax bill currently moving through Congress that would hand major tax cuts to corporations and the rich while giving marginal benefits to working families via a partial revival of the expanded child tax credit.

Leaders in Congress are working on a bill that would revive the pandemic-spurred child tax credit expansion, but lower the total from $3,600 per child to $2,000 per child per year and still impose an income limit that wouldn’t allow the poorest families to access the full benefit. And though the child tax credit portion of the bill has been much touted, the bill — dubbed the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act — would also hand out hugely disproportionate tax breaks to the wealthy.

In order to please Republicans and their deep-pocketed donors, bill authors inserted a number of tax-related favors for corporations, like expanding deductions that businesses can file for in the future and retroactively. These tax cuts come on top of the 2017 Republican Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which already slashed the corporate tax rate and have allowed major corporations to owe $0 on their taxes some years despite raking in profits.

Tlaib condemned the cuts for corporations and the wealthy in a statement on Wednesday, pointing to calculations about how they would grant these groups favors at a time of already massive wealth inequality.

The press release points out that, just in the first year, the richest 0.1 percent of American households would get an average tax cut of $57,530 — nearly the entirety of what the median worker makes in a year — while the poorest 20 percent, or 88 million households, would get only $60.

Meanwhile, corporations that are “already dodging paying their fair share of taxes,” as Tlaib said, would see their effective tax rates cut even more; the effective tax rate for Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, would drop from 25 percent to -2 percent if the bill were passed, she pointed out.

The bill has been estimated to cost $78 billion — but tax experts have warned that the bill will cost far, far more if the tax cuts are extended as they’re expected to be. If implemented over the next decade, the corporate tax breaks alone would add $600 billion to the deficit, some research has found. The bill is expected to face a vote on Wednesday in the House.

“Working families in my district should never be paying higher taxes than the richest companies on earth,” Tlaib said. “I cannot support a bill that deepens wealth inequality and economic injustice to benefit the richest Americans and corporations.”

Instead, Tlaib calls for lawmakers to pass the End Child Poverty Act, which she and Representatives Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) and Jesús “Chuy” García (D-Illinois) introduced last year. The bill would combine provisions in the current child tax credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit in order to create a “universal child benefit” that would provide families with a payment of $428 per child per month, or over $5,000 a year.

The progressive lawmakers’ bill would cut child poverty by 61 percent, the lawmakers have found. By contrast, estimates for the bipartisan proposal find that it would still leave 93 percent of children in the poorest 20 percent of households without the full tax credit, and would lift 400,000 children out of poverty — compared to the 3.8 million children lifted out of poverty by the expanded COVID-era tax credit.

“Our families deserve bold, transformative policies that take meaningful steps to end child poverty at its roots,” Tlaib said. “We need real solutions, not more tax breaks for the rich. We should stay at the table and demand a better deal for our children, not settle for crumbs.”

Other Democrats have also cited the tax bill’s disproportionate effects as reasons they’re opposing it.

“The tax deal fails on equity,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut), who has long advocated for child tax credit expansion. “It delivers huge tax cuts for giant corporations while denying middle class families the economic security they had under the expanded, monthly Child Tax Credit. It also leaves the poorest families behind because of a policy choice. At a time when a majority of American voters believe tax on big corporations should be increased, there is no reason we should be providing corporations a tax cut while only giving families pennies.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.