Skip to content Skip to footer

In 41 States, Richest 1 Percent Pay Lowest Tax Rate of Any Group

In 34 states, the families with the lowest incomes pay the highest tax rate of any other group.

The richest 1 percent are benefiting greatly from highly regressive state and local tax codes across the U.S., with tax laws strongly favoring concentrating more wealth in the hands of the rich in the vast majority of states, a new report reveals.

According to a report on state and local tax codes by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), the vast majority of state tax and local codes are regressive, meaning that people with higher incomes pay a lower proportion of their incomes than families with low- and middle-incomes.

The wealthiest Americans are reaping the most benefits from regressive tax codes. In 41 states, the report found, the top 1 percent richest households pay a lower proportion of their incomes than the rest of the population, despite having the most ability to part with their incomes; and in all but four states, the top 1 percent are taxed less than the middle 60 percent, a group often categorized as the “middle class” by economists.

In 34 states, meanwhile, the families with the lowest incomes not only pay more of their incomes in taxes than the richest households, they also pay the highest tax rate of anyone else in the state.

These upside-down tax rates have led to tax structures that worsen wealth inequality in 44 states, ITEP found.

This is especially pronounced in the states with the most unequal tax structures, the report found; those with the lowest 20 percent of incomes are taxed at an average rate that’s three times higher than the rate of the wealthiest earners in the states with the 10 most regressive tax codes — Florida, Washington, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Illinois, Arkansas and Louisiana.

In Florida, which ranked the worst on ITEP’s inequality index, the top 1 percent pay only 2.7 percent of their incomes on taxes on average, while the lowest 20 percent pay 13.2 percent — nearly five times more. By contrast, in the region with the least regressive tax code, Washington, D.C., the top 1 percent paid 11.4 percent of their incomes into taxes, while the lowest 20 percent paid 4.8 percent.

These inequalities are also seen across racial lines; in Tennessee, for instance, ITEP has previously found that Black and Latinx families pay about 1 percent more of their incomes compared to the state average. In Minnesota, the state with the least regressive tax code, Black, Latinx and Indigenous families paid a lower proportion than the state average.

ITEP notes that one of the most important factors driving tax inequality is the type of tax levied by the state or local government. Personal and corporate income tax tend to be the most progressive type of tax, since they are directly calculated based on someone’s income. Property taxes are somewhat regressive, the report found, with low-income homeowners and renters paying more of their income in property taxes than the wealthy.

Sales and excise taxes — or taxes on goods like alcoholic beverages or gasoline — are the most regressive type of tax, the report noted. This is because everyone pays the same dollar amount for this type of tax, which means that lower-income people are paying a larger proportion of their incomes than higher-income people for the same goods.

“The wide variety of results seen across states in this study proves that regressive state and local taxation is not inevitable. It is a policy choice,” the report says. “It is ultimately up to the public and their elected officials to decide whether they want to continue a status quo where, in most states, the highest-income families face the lowest state and local tax rates.”

The analysis comes as income inequality is on the rise across the globe and wealth inequality has skyrocketed in the U.S., particularly in the last few years. A recent report by Americans for Tax Fairness using Federal Reserve data found that America’s billionaires and people with over $100 million in wealth collectively held a towering $8.5 trillion in unrealized capital gains in 2022, meaning that the wealth that this select group of individuals are sitting on with their assets alone is more than double the wealth held by the entire bottom 50 percent in the U.S. combined.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy