Since Lisa Jackson announced that she would resign her post as administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, environmental advocates have anxiously awaited news of who would take her place. On Monday, the suspense came to an end as President Barack Obama announced his official nomination: Gina McCarthy, the assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation and a known champion for public health.
While Jackson tried her best during a time of unprecedented obstruction, many were disappointed with her overall accomplishments as EPA chief. Few of us will ever forget her brazen testimony to Congress that “there’s no proof fracking is dangerous.” Those who place a priority on environmental health and resource conservation have plenty of reason to believe that McCarthy will be a more productive leader.
Wondering about McCarthy’s pedigree and why enviros are so excited to see her head up the EPA? Here are three things you should know:
1. She’s got experience. McCarthy previously served as the assistant administrator of the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. The office develops policies and regulations for limiting air pollution and radiation exposure. In this position, McCarthy helped implement new or improved national standards for pollutants such as mercury, sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions, and soot, and she oversaw the first-ever limits on greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants.
2. She knows how to work with Republicans. McCarthy served as an environmental policy adviser to Governor Mitt Romney in Massachusetts, and she helped launch the state’s Climate Protection Action Plan. Starting in 2004, she was head of Connecticut’s Department of Environmental Protection under Governor Jodi Rell, where she coordinated the state’s involvement in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a regional program to limit global warming pollution from power plants. “McCarthy’s stellar work under two Republican governors as well as her excellent work over the past four years at the EPA is proof that when it comes to protecting our health and environment, it isn’t about who you work for or what party you represent,” said Margie Alt, executive director for Environment America. “It’s about whether you can get the job done. And Gina McCarthy can get the job done.”
3. She likes science. “Many environmentalists see her pragmatism and reliance on a science-based standard as a good way to broker potential deals with those that oppose the EPA’s agenda,” writes Morgana Matus for Inhabitat. “Delivering speeches without a prompter and with a sharp sense of humor, McCarthy has been known to win over skeptics with her blunt, personable style.” She’s also got a lot of experience dealing with industry, especially those prone to big pollution, putting her in a unique position to demonstrate that the arguments for economic security and environmental protection are really two sides of the same coin.
Currently, there are no immediate signs of an industry-backed groundswell to derail McCarthy’s confirmation. Leading advocates for the petroleum, mining and coal-fired power industries issued restrained statements either congratulating her or praising her for working with them on past regulations, reports Politico.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.