After the global financial crisis hit in 2008, federal spending spiraled out of control. The government made controversial interventions to prevent the economy from descending into depression. The federal debt rose relentlessly.
The federal government is only allowed to borrow up to a specified limit set by law, the “debt ceiling.” Even if spending bills have been approved and passed into law, the government cannot borrow the money to fulfill those obligations once it hits the debt ceiling.
Since federal tax receipts vary from year to year, the interest paid on the federal debt changes according to market rates, and federal spending can increase unexpectedly when (for example) people lose their jobs and claim unemployment benefits, the government can never know for sure when it might run up against the debt ceiling.
The result is a series of repeated emergencies in which the debt ceiling must be raised or the government will have to shut down. Ultimately the government could even default on its obligations, wrecking havoc on bond markets. And since borrowing always seems to go up, not down, the problem never goes away.
The debt ceiling has been reached multiple times since the beginning of the global financial crisis, and another debt ceiling crisis is right around the corner.
Except that there will be no crisis, because the country is Australia.
Just like the United States, Australia has a debt ceiling. Australian borrowing bumps up against this ceiling on a regular basis. And just as in the United States, the debt ceiling is an absolute limit on government spending that cannot be transgressed even if the Australian parliament has passed a bill authorizing additional expenditures.
But there the similarity ends. Australia has no debates over default, no dramatic government shutdowns, no sequestration and no fiscal cliffs. When the government reaches the debt ceiling, the ceiling is raised in an orderly manner. No one panics. Everyone gets paid.
It used to work that way in the United States, too. The debt ceiling has only come to be politicized in recent years. This situation is ludicrous – and dangerous. Once the government has incurred a legal obligation, we should all expect the government to meet it.
America’s debt ceiling brinksmanship has made us a global laughingstock. In no other developed country do political parties threaten to push the government into default if they don’t get their way. This kind of take-no-prisoners politics is more characteristic of third-world dictatorships than first-world democracies.
The United States doesn’t have to have a debt ceiling. At the next reauthorization (which by most accounts will be the 90th or so) Congress could simply abolish the ceiling. But Australia’s experience shows this is unnecessary. If America’s politicians could be as sober and mature as Australia’s, we wouldn’t have to worry about it.
The Australians I know will be rolling in the aisles to hear their politicians described as “sober and mature.” Australian politics is highly partisan, often very personal and nothing if not robust. But it is not self-destructive. America – and America’s politicians – could learn some important lessons in democracy from looking overseas. America’s own democracy is, perhaps, not the example it once was.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.