Skip to content Skip to footer

Ted Kennedy’s Diary Shows Alito Lied About Maintaining Precedent in “Roe”

“I recognize there is a right to privacy,” Alito said to the senator.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito testifies during a hearing of the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee on March 7, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

As a nominee for the Supreme Court in 2005, Samuel Alito privately assured Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) that he wouldn’t seek to undo abortion rights protections that were established in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, excerpts from the late senator’s diary reveal.

The passages from Kennedy’s diary were published in The New York Times this week to promote a new book titled “Ted Kennedy: A Life,” written by biographer John Farrell.

According to what Kennedy wrote after meeting with Alito, who was courting him and other senators after being nominated by former President George W. Bush, Alito said he was a “believer in precedents.”

“I recognize there is a right to privacy. I think it’s settled,” Alito told Kennedy, referring to the underlying arguments that established abortion protections within Roe.

Kennedy was skeptical, however, and asked Alito about an anti-abortion memo he wrote while working for the Reagan administration. Alito assured Kennedy that his views in the 1980s didn’t reflect his current ones, and that he had written the memo while seeking a promotion.

“I was a younger person. I’ve matured a lot,” Alito said.

Unpersuaded, Kennedy went on to vote against Alito’s confirmation. If the nominee could change his views in order to get a promotion, the late senator wrote, he could not trust that his views on the right to abortion would remain consistent.

Kennedy’s concerns were prescient — 16 years after making similar statements about Roe to the Senate in his confirmation hearings (calling the ruling “important precedent of the Supreme Court”), the Supreme Court justice would pen the majority opinion in the case that dismantled federal abortion protections, claiming that Roe was “egregiously wrong from the start” — a sentiment that the vast majority of Americans disagree with.

Alito’s ruling was littered with selective reasoning. He claimed, for example, that abortion “is not deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition,” when in fact, abortion was practiced for many years in the U.S. before states began restricting the practice in the late 1800s.

Alito also attacked the right to privacy in his ruling, contradicting his statement to Kennedy that he recognized the right as real.

Critics condemned the sitting justice of the High Court after news of his deception was published.

“So as a younger attorney he ‘lied to his bosses to get a promotion’ and 20 years later he lied to Kennedy and the Senate to…get a promotion,” writer and filmmaker Andy Ostroy said on Twitter. “Alito is a despicable ethically-bankrupt liar.”

“Unlike Susan Collins, Ted Kennedy understood what these guys were peddling and how [fundamentally] dishonest they were,” said Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin.

“Ted Kennedy’s diaries prove again that Samuel Alito is a liar, an activist Justice with an agenda and a disgrace to a delegitimized Supreme Court,” said public opinion researcher Fernand Amandi.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.