Skip to content Skip to footer

Ted Kennedy’s Diary Shows Alito Lied About Maintaining Precedent in “Roe”

“I recognize there is a right to privacy,” Alito said to the senator.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito testifies during a hearing of the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee on March 7, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.

As a nominee for the Supreme Court in 2005, Samuel Alito privately assured Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) that he wouldn’t seek to undo abortion rights protections that were established in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, excerpts from the late senator’s diary reveal.

The passages from Kennedy’s diary were published in The New York Times this week to promote a new book titled “Ted Kennedy: A Life,” written by biographer John Farrell.

According to what Kennedy wrote after meeting with Alito, who was courting him and other senators after being nominated by former President George W. Bush, Alito said he was a “believer in precedents.”

“I recognize there is a right to privacy. I think it’s settled,” Alito told Kennedy, referring to the underlying arguments that established abortion protections within Roe.

Kennedy was skeptical, however, and asked Alito about an anti-abortion memo he wrote while working for the Reagan administration. Alito assured Kennedy that his views in the 1980s didn’t reflect his current ones, and that he had written the memo while seeking a promotion.

“I was a younger person. I’ve matured a lot,” Alito said.

Unpersuaded, Kennedy went on to vote against Alito’s confirmation. If the nominee could change his views in order to get a promotion, the late senator wrote, he could not trust that his views on the right to abortion would remain consistent.

Kennedy’s concerns were prescient — 16 years after making similar statements about Roe to the Senate in his confirmation hearings (calling the ruling “important precedent of the Supreme Court”), the Supreme Court justice would pen the majority opinion in the case that dismantled federal abortion protections, claiming that Roe was “egregiously wrong from the start” — a sentiment that the vast majority of Americans disagree with.

Alito’s ruling was littered with selective reasoning. He claimed, for example, that abortion “is not deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition,” when in fact, abortion was practiced for many years in the U.S. before states began restricting the practice in the late 1800s.

Alito also attacked the right to privacy in his ruling, contradicting his statement to Kennedy that he recognized the right as real.

Critics condemned the sitting justice of the High Court after news of his deception was published.

“So as a younger attorney he ‘lied to his bosses to get a promotion’ and 20 years later he lied to Kennedy and the Senate to…get a promotion,” writer and filmmaker Andy Ostroy said on Twitter. “Alito is a despicable ethically-bankrupt liar.”

“Unlike Susan Collins, Ted Kennedy understood what these guys were peddling and how [fundamentally] dishonest they were,” said Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin.

“Ted Kennedy’s diaries prove again that Samuel Alito is a liar, an activist Justice with an agenda and a disgrace to a delegitimized Supreme Court,” said public opinion researcher Fernand Amandi.

An important fundraising appeal: We still need to raise $9,000

Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. Today, as political censorship from the right intensifies, we have no choice but to ask for your help.

We are fundraising right now to cover our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work. Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support.