Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito mocked world leaders who criticized his anti-abortion ruling last month and decried what he called a “hostility to religion” in his first public comments since the decision.
Alito, who authored the court’s majority opinion in the Dobbs case that overturned Roe v. Wade, bragged during a surprise appearance at a religious conference hosted by the Notre Dame Law School’s Religious Liberty Initiative in Rome last week that he wrote the opinion in what he described as the case “whose name may not be spoken.”
“I had the honor this term of writing I think the only Supreme Court decision in the history of that institution that has been lambasted by a whole string of foreign leaders who felt perfectly fine commenting on American law,” he said.
“One of these was former [British] Prime Minister Boris Johnson. But he paid the price,” Alito said, referring to Johnson’s unrelated decision to resign, drawing laughs and cheers from the crowd.
“Others are still in office,” he added, calling out French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for their remarks before lobbing an attack on Prince Harry.
“But what really wounded me was when the Duke of Sussex addressed the United Nations and seemed to compare the decision whose name may not be spoken with the Russian attack on Ukraine,” he quipped.
Prince Harry during a speech at the U.N. said that the court’s decision, along with the invasion of Ukraine, are both evidence that “we are witnessing a global assault on democracy and freedom.”
“Despite this temptation, I’m not going to talk about cases from other countries,” Alito continued. “All I’m going to say is that, ultimately, if we are going to win the battle to protect religious freedom in an increasingly secular society, we will need more than positive law.”
In his Rome speech on religious liberty, Justice Alito mocked “foreign leaders” who condemned his opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, including Boris Johnson, Macron, Trudeau, and … Prince Harry.
Of Boris, Alito quipped: “He paid the price.” https://t.co/NPqalw0KA6 pic.twitter.com/xC0qguZ31n
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) July 28, 2022
Alito during his remarks alleged that “religious liberty is under attack” even though the impenetrable conservative majority on the Supreme Court gave religious rights groups their biggest wins in generations this term: striking down abortion rights, siding with a public high school football coach who prayed on the field after games, and banning Maine from excluding religious schools from tuition assistance programs.
“It is hard to convince people that religious liberty is worth defending if they don’t think that religion is a good thing that deserves protection,” Alito said.
Alito’s speech came on the same day that liberal Justice Elena Kagan warned that the court’s hard-right majority risks losing legitimacy in the eyes of Americans.
“I’m not talking about any particular decision or even any particular series of decisions, but if over time the court loses all connection with the public and with public sentiment, that’s a dangerous thing for a democracy,” she said during a conference in Montana last week. “People are rightly suspicious if one justice leaves the court or dies and another justice takes his or her place and all of sudden the law changes on you.”
Confidence in the Supreme Court hit a record low after the Dobbs decision, according to a Gallup poll, falling to just 25%.
Alito’s appearance at the conference was not announced in advance and the video was published by the law school on Thursday. The event was sponsored by the school’s Religious Liberty Initiative, which aims to promote “religious freedom for people of all faiths through scholarship, events, and the Law School’s Religious Liberty Clinic,” and files briefs to the Supreme Court, according to The Washington Post.
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., called out Alito’s remarks at the conference, calling him an “embarrassment to the Supreme Court.”
“He doesn’t understand there are different religions in America,” Lieu tweeted. “What makes America great is that we let you practice your faith, change your faith or have no faith at all. Some religions support abortion, some don’t.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said that Alito’s leaked opinion ahead of the ruling “paired with his politicized remarks” should be “alarming to anyone.”
“The Supreme Court is in a legitimacy crisis,” she tweeted, calling on Chief Justice John Roberts to get to the bottom of who leaked the draft opinion.
Roberts sought to save Roe and lobbied fellow conservatives to change their vote until the leak upended his attempts just as anti-abortion activists were growing concerned about his efforts, according to CNN.
Other critics also cited Alito’s remarks as further evidence of the politicization of the Supreme Court.
“Alito is not just a partisan hack. He is the leader of this partisan and reckless court, and he is a clear and present danger to our basic system of governance and of justice,” wrote Norm Ornstein, an Emeritus scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
“Alito is so extremist far right,” quipped former Obama adviser Ben Rhodes, “that his idea of owning the libs is taking shots at Boris Johnson.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 10 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.