Skip to content Skip to footer

Ted Cruz Urges Trump to Unilaterally Slash Taxes for the Rich

This demand for executive action is hypocritical even by Ted Cruz standards.

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee member Sen. Ted Cruz prepares to leave a hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on March 13, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, a longtime critic of presidents who use executive action, sent a letter signed by 20 of his Republican colleagues asking the Trump administration to unilaterally slash taxes for the rich.

The Republican senators sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Monday asking him to use his “authority” to index capital gains to inflation. The move would allow investors to pay lower taxes on profits made from selling real estate, stocks or bonds by adjusting the original purchase price so that there would be no tax liability on appreciation tied to inflation.

“The United States economy has experienced historic levels of growth as a result of Congress and the current Administration’s policies such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” the letter claimed, falsely. (The Congressional Research Service found these policies had no impact on growth or wages.) The move, the letter said, would ensure that “everyday Americans can continue to enjoy better lives and livelihoods.”

A 2018 study by researchers at Penn Wharton found that indexing capital gains to inflation would not significantly benefit “everyday Americans.” About 95 percent of the benefits from the move would go to the top 5 percent of taxpayers, according to the study.

The letter urged Mnuchin to use “executive authority” to remove the “unfair” tax that primarily affects the uber-wealthy.

It’s quite a reversal from Cruz’s previous criticism that presidents who act unilaterally through executive action “should concern every citizen.” Using executive authority to bypass Congress was “lawless” and akin to “dictatorships,” Cruz wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed when Barack Obama was in office.

It’s also unclear how Cruz and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who also signed the letter after opposing a 9/11 first responders compensation bill because it wasn’t revenue-neutral, plan to pay for the massive tax cut they seek. According to Penn Wharton, the move would cost the U.S. more than $100 billion in tax revenues.

“Indexing capital gains to inflation would unlock capital for investment, increase wages, create new jobs, and grow the economy, benefiting Americans across all income levels,” the letter said.

This is the same argument Republicans and Trump used when pushing the 2017 tax cuts, which they claimed — despite numerous studies to the contrary — would pay for themselves. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the tax cuts will actually cost about $1.9 trillion even after accounting for growth, and the House Budget Committee found that the benefits of the cuts have disproportionately benefited the wealthy and large corporations.

Mnuchin has been noncommittal on the idea thus far.

“Right now there’s no commitment to getting it done or not getting it done,” he told Bloomberg News last month. “It’s a policy that has been under consideration and remains under consideration.”

Bloomberg reported that National Economic Council director Larry Kudlow has long been a proponent of the change and that Trump has been “looking for issues to win favor with voters and donors.”

But even those on the right don’t think the move would help Trump win over Republican voters.

“You can soundly put me in the camp that I don’t think the economic effects will be very large or very noticeable,” Kyle Pomerleau, an economist at the right-wing Tax Foundation, told Bloomberg. “If this is the strategy to juice the economy before the election, this is certainly not the best way to do it.”

A group of Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, sent their own letter to Mnuchin earlier this month recommending against the change.

“We urge you to reject reported plans to use questionable authority to — yet again — lavish tax cuts upon our country’s wealthiest,” Brown wrote, “while middle class families and working people continue to see costs rise and wages stagnate.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.