Skip to content Skip to footer

Ted Cruz Illegally Used Campaign Funds to Promote His Book, Watchdog Says

The senator spent nearly $18,000 in campaign money on Facebook advertisements for his book, the watchdog alleges.

Sen. Ted Cruz addresses the Conservative Political Action Conference held in the Hyatt Regency on February 26, 2021, in Orlando, Florida.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) broke campaign finance law in using donations to fund promotions for his book, a government watchdog alleged Wednesday.

The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the Senate Ethics Committee alleging that Cruz spent up to nearly $18,000 in campaign money on Facebook advertisements exclusively promoting his book last year. It urged viewers to “order your copy today” or “buy my new book” CLC says, and included a link to buy the book from third-party sellers like Amazon.

The ads all included a disclaimer saying “Paid for by Ted Cruz for Senate,” both complaints say. The book was released in September, and the campaign ran ads between September 24 and October 5, 2020, CLC said.

According to a financial disclosure report, Cruz gets 15 percent in royalties on sales of hardcover copies of his book and received a $400,000 advance from his publisher. The CLC says that because Cruz benefits financially from sales of the book the advertisements were a “blatant disregard” of campaign finance laws and violated the rules of the Senate.

“Because Cruz receives royalties from book sales, his campaign crossed a legal line by spending donor funds on Facebook ads promoting sales of that book,” said Brendan Fischer, CLC director of federal reform, in a statement. The FEC prohibits the use of campaign funds for personal gain. In some cases, campaigns may use campaign funds to buy books as a donor gift, as long as royalties are withheld, CLC says.

Fischer adds that it’s possible that Cruz spent campaign money on advertising the book on platforms other than Google and Facebook that aren’t publicly viewable.

The Senate’s rules against using donations for personal reasons are “crystal clear,” said Delaney Marsco, senior legal counsel for ethics at CLC, in a statement. “Voters must be able to trust that when they are donating to political campaigns, they are doing so to help their favored candidate win or retain their office, not financing their personal endeavors,” Marsco said.

“In light of these facts, Campaign Legal Center respectfully requests that you investigate whether Senator Cruz has violated FECA, FEC regulations, and Senate rules,” said CLC in its letter to Ethics Committee Chairman Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware).

Cruz also came under scrutiny for a similar issue regarding book purchases in February. Earlier this year, a leadership PAC connected with Cruz paid $1.2 million to a company that appeared to have spent the money on buying Cruz’s book. Cruz, then, could have collected royalties on the book sales. An adviser to Cruz has denied the story.

An attorney for Cruz has also denied the CLC’s allegations, saying in a statement that Cruz “has not received any royalties whatsoever for these book sales.”

But Fischer said that that was not possible for Cruz or his attorneys to ascertain. “There seems to be no legitimate way for Cruz to know how many books were purchased as a result of these Facebook ads,” Fischer told CNBC, “and therefore it’s impossible to say that Cruz is not receiving royalties on the books sold as a result of the ads.”

The FEC, CLC notes, allows candidates to use a trivially small amount of money to promote their book on their campaign website. But, they write, “Ted Cruz for Senate did not post a single sentence of promotional material on a campaign website at little to no cost; rather, the committee spent thousands of dollars of campaign funds on standalone ads that were entirely focused on promoting the sale of Cruz’s book.”

Earlier this year, Cruz also had a Senate ethics complaint filed against him for his role in inciting the attack on the Capitol on January 6. Senate Democrats had filed a complaint against Cruz and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) in January in order to “fully understand their role” in the attack. Hawley has also allegedly used campaign funds improperly, apparently using donor funds to pay for a family vacation.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.