Skip to content Skip to footer

Student Debt Relief Opponent Runs to Chair Education Committee for GOP

Rep. Virginia Foxx has said she would eliminate the Department of Education if given the chance.

Rep. Virginia Foxx speaks at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 9, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina is a vocal opponent of the Biden administration’s student debt relief plan and has said she would shutter the Department of Education if given the chance. Foxx has led the Republican minority on the House Committee on Education and Labor since 2017 and is the top candidate to chair the committee when the GOP majority takes over next year.

Due to term limit rules, Foxx received a waiver this week from the Republican steering committee to run for chair. Rep. Tim Walberg of Michigan is currently challenging Foxx for the gavel. Both Republicans support charter schools and the privatization of public education, and they regularly attack teachers’ unions and organized labor in general. The House GOP’s steering committee is expected to announce committee chairs in the next few weeks.

“If installed as chair of the House Education and Labor Committee, Foxx has made clear her top priorities are defunding the Department of Education, keeping students saddled with … student debt and lining the pockets of corrupt for-profit colleges,” said Zac Petkanas, senior adviser to the House Accountability War Room, in a statement.

The House Accountability War Room is an independent group of Democrat-aligned strategists that recently formed to keep tabs on extremists in the new House majority. Progressives say tensions between the House GOP’s far right flank, still bristling with MAGA energy and hungry for revenge, and the party establishment over the next two years will reveal to voters just how extreme Republicans have become under the influence of former President Donald Trump and his base of supporters.

Congressional Republicans did not release a platform and were wary of discussing the specifics of their agenda ahead of the midterms, opting instead to make the election a referendum on President Joe Biden.

“Her extreme MAGA positions — which put the interests of the massively wealthy above those of everyday Americans — are an indication of the dangerous level of extremism we can expect from the new House majority across all committees,” Petkanas added.

Foxx hails from a conservative district in North Carolina, and her views reflect those of state-level right-wing activists who have lashed out at educators since schools closed during the pandemic. The so-called parental rights movement demands censorship of LGBTQ and racial justice materials in school libraries and curricula while pushing for voucher programs that would direct funding from public schools to private schools.

Foxx, apparently one of the most vocal members of the House, has told conservative news outlets that she would abolish the federal Department of Education given the chance.

“If the Lord put me in charge, I would do it,” Foxx told Real Clear Politics in 2017.

Foxx was a staunch ally of Trump’s education secretary, Betsy DeVos, the billionaire champion of school privatization who said the department she ran should not exist. Sen. Bernie Sanders once called DeVos the “worst education secretary in the history of America.”

Abolishing the Department of Education has been a quixotic goal for Republicans since the department was created four decades ago. Achieving this goal has proven to be a deeply complicated and so far impossible task that would open up Republicans to intense attacks from Democrats and the left.

Public support for the department is largely divided along partisan lines, and the relatively tiny federal agency manages massive student loan and grant programs, collects data on schools nationwide, and looks out for the civil rights of marginalized and disabled students — at least when Republicans like DeVos are not in charge.

The Department of Education may get some lip service from the House if Foxx chairs the committee, but student loan forgiveness would clearly be a target. Foxx is a vocal supporter for the lawsuit that has held up Biden’s student debt cancellation plan in court, saying in a statement that Biden “will say and do anything to appease his radical progressive base.”

Foxx’s press team did not respond to Truthout’s request for comment on Friday.

A recent poll found that 77 percent of voters between the ages of 18 and 29 say the student debt relief plan motivated them to vote in the midterms, when the long-expected “red wave” of GOP victories failed to materialize. With a Democratic majority in the Senate, it’s unlikely that legislation from Foxx’s committee would make it to the president’s desk. Still, if committees debate bills sponsored by the party’s far right, leaders like Foxx will be under pressure to live up to previous statements aimed at the MAGA base.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.