New York – Despite questions about her credibility, the Sofitel maid who is accusing former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn of sexual assault is still a victim and should be treated as one, according to her attorney.
“The victim here made some mistakes, but that doesn't mean she's not a rape victim,” her attorney, Kenneth Thompson, told reporters on Friday.
He claimed that District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. was trying to drop the case in order to save face, and stressed that the 32-year-old alleged victim still deserved justice.
On Friday, Strauss-Kahn was released from house arrest in New York without bail, after prosecutors brought documents before the court challenging his accuser's credibility.
Strauss-Khan's lawyers say the accuser confessed to fabricating the details of her asylum application. They also claim that she lied on income tax documents, and fudged the specifics of her whereabouts after the alleged attack.
But many are questioning the relevance of those confessions to the trial.
“All of those things do not have anything to do with whether or not she was raped,” said Human Rights Watch's Marianne Mollman in an interview with IPS.
“I would like to see one single person who has never told a lie in their life,” she added.
Thompson acknowledged the significance of the new information.
“Her credibility is important, any rape victim's credibility is important,” he said, “but you cannot become blind to the physical, corroborating evidence.” The real question, he said, is, “What is true?”
He noted photos of the accuser's bruises, doctor's reports of a shoulder injury, and a pair of stockings, allegedly torn by Strauss- Kahn as the woman tried to escape.
“When he threw her to the floor, he tore a ligament in her shoulder. That is a fact,” Thompson said. “Dominique Strauss-Kahn ripped her stockings. There are holes in her stockings, and the DA knows that. She spit his semen in the room, she spit it on the floor, and as soon as her supervisor came upstairs, she saw that…Detectives of the NYPD, they saw that,” he added.
According to the accuser's daughter, several weeks ago prosecutors met with the accuser and “mistreated” her, repeatedly screaming and yelling at her.
“The way they had treated the victim was no way to treat a rape victim,” Thompson said.
Refugee status: More valuable than truth?
According to Joseph Chamie, director of research at New York's Center for Migration Studies, most migrants will do whatever it takes to get into the United States.
“Many people are desperate to get into the more developed countries, the wealthier countries, for work,” he told IPS.
“There's more than a billion people in Africa. There's more than a billion people in India, as well as China. We have rapid growth in Pakistan, and we have growth in Central America and the Caribbean. These people, many of them want to leave and go to wealthier places,” he explained.
But poverty is not a recognised condition for refugee status.
“Underdevelopment is not legitimate criteria for being a refugee, so if you're coming from a poor country, you can't claim you're a refugee,” Chamie explained.
Independent journalism is rare. Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your email daily.
“The supply for economic migrants – it's enormous,” he said. “Supply is much larger than demand.”
So with the stakes set high, some resort to forging their asylum documents.
And once these migrants are in the country, they will do what it takes to stay. Many immigrants – especially those who are undocumented – face exploitation by employers but “feel reluctant to come forward because they may be identified and asked to return home,” according to Chamie.
“Especially women,” he noted. “They're more likely to be victimised than men.”
Now there are concerns that the handling of the Strauss-Kahn case will hinder other vulnerable women from seeking help.
Human Rights Watch's Mollman pointed to other obstacles in the justice system for migrants, such as language barriers.
“That's something that we've seen with immigrants in other types of cases,” she said, “not just for sexual assault cases.”
As for Strauss-Kahn's accuser, Thompson hopes the judge can look beyond her history and focus on the details of the case.
“She has never once changed a single thing about the account,” he said, regardless of her other admissions.
Mollman agreed.
“What's disturbing is that what we're talking about here is not the evidence of the rape – it's about other parts of her life,” she said.
“Already there are many excuses for rape that have been used successfully that are outrageous,” she said, listing a few: 'It's not rape if she was drunk,' 'It's not rape if it's my wife,' 'It's not rape if it's my daughter,' 'It's not rape if my culture says that I need to do this.'
“There are all kinds of excuses,” she told IPS, “and I just think we need to be careful not to add to that list, 'It's not rape if she's an immigrant' . . . or, 'It's not rape if she lied on her income tax.'”
“I mean, those are not defences in rape cases,” she said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.