Washington – In a classic political case of better late than never, South Carolina Republicans who earlier spurned Mitt Romney are belatedly embracing him as he closes in on their party’s presidential nomination.
But in South Carolina, one of the hotbeds of the nation’s tea party movement and where Republican activists spent long months taking an anyone-but-Romney stance, the embrace feels reluctant – more weak handshake than hearty hug.
Romney might be in little danger of losing the state to President Barack Obama in November; Southerner Jimmy Carter in 1976 was the last Democrat to carry South Carolina in a presidential general election. But the degree of enthusiasm for Romney in the Palmetto State will provide a barometer for his ability to motivate party activists who could determine the outcome in a dozen swing states that are likely to decide the election.
South Carolina is the only state outside his native Georgia that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich won, a reflection of Romney’s difficulties exciting the Republican base.
South Carolina state Sen. Tom Davis, a tea party leader, backed Rep. Ron Paul of Texas for president. But he now has some good things to say about Romney, though in words that sound as much like a warning as an endorsement.
“If he frames the debate between President Obama’s agenda of an ever-growing and more powerful government versus faith in free markets and individual liberty, I think he’s got a good chance of winning,” Davis, a lawyer in Beaufort, S.C., told McClatchy.
“If he doesn’t draw the line that sharply and tries to tack toward the center, then I think it will be very difficult,” Davis said.
South Carolina’s streak of choosing the eventual nominee in the previous six contested Republican White House races – going back to Ronald Reagan’s 1980 win – ended this year when Gingrich captured the Jan. 21 primary with 40.4 percent of the vote.
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, came in a distant second with 27.8 percent. That showing was better than his finish in the state’s 2008 presidential primary, when he ended up fourth with 15.1 percent of the vote.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, who himself has shaky conservative bona fides in the eyes of some GOP stalwarts, urged Republicans to get behind Romney in a manner reminiscent of a doctor calling in a prescription.
“People say, ‘I may not like Romney because of this or that,’” Graham told WORD Radio in Greenville, S.C., on Monday.
“It’s not just about Romney,” he said. “It’s about the people he will put in charge of the government. And I can assure you he’s going to put different people in charge of these agencies (than Obama) and will pick different judges. That alone is enough for me to vote for Romney.”
South Carolina state Rep. Nathan Ballentine, a Wells Fargo mortgage officer in Chapin, S.C., was one of the first state legislators to endorse Romney – 11 months ago. Ballentine doesn’t understand why his Republican peers aren’t more bullish on Romney, who he says is just what the nation needs at this point in its history.
“Gov. Romney is a businessman,” Ballentine said. “He’s not a fly-by-the-seat-of-his-pants kind of guy. Some people think that means he’s too calculated, but I think he’s exactly what we need. He is a CEO who’s got a plan to get our country back on track. He’s not a rah-rah kind of guy, but there aren’t too many CEOs who are.”
Rep. Jeff Duncan, a freshman Republican from Laurens, S.C., who was elected to Congress in 2010 with strong tea party support, said GOP activists’ antipathy toward Obama will be enough to rally their support for Romney.
“Gov. Romney’s policies would be a clear departure from the dubious tactics of the Obama administration,” said Duncan, who hasn’t endorsed Romney or any other Republican candidate.
“I’m confident that Gov. Romney can win over the American people on the promise of limited government, defending individual liberties and a return to common-sense solutions to our country’s biggest problems,” Duncan said.
South Carolina GOP chairman Chad Connelly met with Romney last week and heard his speech to state party leaders gathered in Arizona.
“He was as comfortable, relaxed and in command as I’ve ever seen him,” Connelly said. “He’s a better candidate than he was a year ago. He’s able to articulate all the reasons we need to make sure Obama is just the worst one-term president ever.”
While Romney didn’t win the South Carolina primary, Connelly noted that more Republicans cast ballots _ 607,000 _ than ever before.
“When Gov. Romney is the eventual nominee, they’ll be excited because they’re so disgusted at what Obama has done, trashing the Constitution and pushing Obamacare down our throats,” Connelly said.
Winthrop University political scientist Scott Huffmon, who runs the Rock Hill, S.C., school’s political polls, said that Romney’s support among South Carolina Republicans has been the steadiest among all presidential candidates, but that he always trailed at least one other “anti-Romney” opponent during the primary season.
“Romney has had solid support, but not great enthusiasm,” Huffmon said. “All that said, Republicans in South Carolina will very much line up to vote for him over Barack Obama.”
© 2012 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 24 hours to add 180 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.