Skip to content Skip to footer

Social Media Users Could Be Sued for Defamation Under Florida’s Anti-Press Bill

Evidence affirming factual bigotry couldn't be used in a person's defense if they're sued under the terms of the bill.

Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking with attendees at the 2022 Student Action Summit at the Tampa Convention Center in Tampa, Florida.

A bill proposed in the Florida Republican-controlled state legislature that aims to make it easier for public figures, including lawmakers, to sue news media for coverage they dislike would also have severe repercussions for anyone (not just those in the news industry) who use social media to point out someone else’s bigoted behavior.

In addition to granting greater leeways for defamation lawsuits for public figures against the press, House Bill 991 would also give Florida residents the right to sue others (both in the state or elsewhere in the U.S.) who describe their actions online as transphobic or homophobic, for sums as high as $35,000, and would not allow the truth to be used in defenses against such lawsuits.

Rather, a person suing another over being called out for their bigoted words online would only have to suggest that their commentary was reflective of their personal religious or (purportedly) scientific beliefs in order to be successful in their suit, even if their words truly were transphobic or homophobic, according to the text of the bill.

The bill, which came about at the behest of Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, classifies “accusations that someone engaged in discrimination as defamation per se with $35k minimum in damages,” Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic Instructor Alejandra Caraballo, who is transgender, said in a series of posts on Twitter explaining the scope of the bill. “If it involves LGBTQ people and someone’s beliefs, truth is no defense” in the lawsuit, Caraballo added.

In a hypothetical situation, a person using an anti-gay slur online and being called homophobic for it could sue the user who described them in such a way. Even if that user’s description of their behavior is accurate (that the person’s words they were commenting on were unambiguously bigoted), if the plaintiff claims they have a religious belief that aligns with their bigotry, they can still sue, with the validity of the bigotry of their statements being dismissed in the lawsuit.

The bill would allow Florida residents to sue anyone, not just other Floridians, who speak out against their bigotry — an online user in Kansas City, Missouri, for instance, could be sued for defamation if they described a user from Orlando, Florida, as homophobic.

“This could chill speech nationally,” legislative researcher and LGBTQ activist Erin Reed said in a blog post, noting that, if passed, the bill could result in “venue shopping” — the practice of seeking out specific courts that are friendly to a litigant’s causes.

The goal of the legislation overall, including but also beyond these provisions, appears to be to loosen or drastically alter defamation standards overall to impact speech and press rights, making it difficult for citizens and media alike to criticize government leaders. Ultimately, the bill will likely be challenged in the courts for being unconstitutional — but that may be Republican lawmakers’ goal, too.

The bill, if passed into law, could find its way up to the federal Supreme Court, where the conservative majority may side with Governor DeSantis and Florida Republicans on the matter, drastically altering precedents that have been in place since the landmark 1964 ruling New York Times v. Sullivan, which limited how public figures (including in government) could sue others making comments against them.

Indeed, the bill’s author Republican Rep. Alex Andrade has commented directly about that ruling in defending it, stating that the standard in that case was an overreach. “This is not the government shutting down free speech. This is a private cause of action,” Andrade has also said.

Free speech and press rights advocates disagree.

“I can’t say I have seen every bill ever introduced, but I’d be quite surprised if any state Legislature had seriously considered such a brazen and blatantly unconstitutional attack on speech and press freedoms,” said Seth Stern, director of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, speaking to Politico on the matter.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.