Skip to content Skip to footer

Senate Parliamentarian Creates New Obstacle for Dems’ Infrastructure Plans

Some Democratic aides say the ruling means lawmakers will have to go bigger on a reconciliation package later this year.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) speaks to the press following a Democratic caucus meeting on May 25, 2021 in Washington, DC.

The Senate parliamentarian has issued new guidance on what routes Democrats in Congress can use to pass much of their legislative agenda, creating new roadblocks in their attempts to utilize a little-known legislative rule that would let them use budget reconciliation more than once in a single fiscal year.

On Friday last week, Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough clarified earlier remarks putting doubts into whether Democrats can use an obscure rule, Rule 304, to get around limitations that only allow Congress to use budget reconciliation once a year, which could throw a major wrench into Democrats’ hopes of passing their legislative agenda.

Democrats are looking for ways to pass bills that can bypass threats of filibusters by Republicans in the Senate. Reconciliation is one such path and is a process that allows bills with budgetary implications to be passed with a simple majority vote in the legislative chamber, but only once every fiscal year.

Democrats used reconciliation in March to pass the American Rescue Plan, the law that provided aid to Americans grappling with the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic. That bill, which received no Republican support whatsoever, was technically passed in the current fiscal year, which ends on September 30. According to traditional rules of Congress, that means Democrats cannot pass another reconciliation bill until later this fall.

Earlier this year, Senate Parliamentarian MacDonough gave Democrats a perceived “win” when she said they could utilize Rule 304 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, which allows for a way to get around the once-per-fiscal-year rule. Amendments to laws passed through reconciliation could themselves use the same process, according to MacDonough, allowing those amendments to pass without filibusters blocking them.

Last Friday, however, MacDonough seemed to reverse her earlier ruling. She also clarified that amendments could not be added on if they had nothing to do with the original bill. She also ruled that legislation could not be passed in a quick manner, but that amendments would have to go through the same congressional committee process in order to pass.

According to reporting from The Hill, that would include going through the Senate Budget Committee, which is currently split evenly between the two parties. That means that any amendment proposed to the last reconciliation bill would need at least one Republican senator to join with Democrats to pass each aspect of the finalized bill, which could result in some parts being passed and others not, or, more likely, very little of the infrastructure package, or the American Jobs Plan, being passed through the committee at all.

In order to get an infrastructure bill passed this summer, President Joe Biden has signaled a willingness to cooperate with Republicans — including potentially cutting his original $2.3 trillion proposal by more than half and finding new ways to fund the bill.

Biden is reportedly open to a $1 trillion plan instead if it means some GOP lawmakers in the Senate would vote for the bill as well. The president is also considering stepping away from raising the corporate tax from 21 percent to 28 percent, as he had originally proposed, to instead create a 15 percent minimum corporate tax rate with no loopholes for wealthy corporations to avoid paying taxes.

Democrats in Congress are considering the opposite approach, however, saying that the new ruling from the parliamentarian means they have to go bigger on infrastructure, not smaller, in order to get more of their priorities passed within a single reconciliation bill during the next fiscal year. “The bottom line is the next one is going to be bigger because you can’t divide it up,” one Democratic aide said to The Hill.

Polling shows that gutting the American Jobs Plan would likely sour voters on the idea of bipartisanship in Washington — and that going big on a single bill is widely supported. According to a survey conducted by Data for Progress last month, 58 percent of voters want both the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan (a bill designed to help working families across the country in myriad ways) to be passed together. Notably, the poll was conducted before Biden cut about $600 billion from the American Jobs Plan to appease Republicans.

“The American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan are overwhelmingly popular and voters support passing both, together through reconciliation, Ethan Winter, a senior analyst at Data for Progress, said to Truthout. “A majority of voters also want Republicans to work with Biden on passing these bills, rather than simply trying to impede the Democratic Party’s legislative agenda.”

Join us in defending the truth before it’s too late

The future of independent journalism is uncertain, and the consequences of losing it are too grave to ignore. To ensure Truthout remains safe, strong, and free, we need to raise $43,000 in the next 6 days. Every dollar raised goes directly toward the costs of producing news you can trust.

Please give what you can — because by supporting us with a tax-deductible donation, you’re not just preserving a source of news, you’re helping to safeguard what’s left of our democracy.