Progressives are pushing Democratic congressional leaders to forcefully oppose the Senate GOP’s coronavirus stimulus legislation after new reporting Monday revealed the package is likely to include a payroll tax cut, a reduction in enhanced unemployment payments, conditions on school funding, and little aid to state and local governments.
“After weeks of sitting on their hands and doing nothing while infections and deaths rise and tens of millions of people fear an imminent economic catastrophe, the reported plan Senate Republicans put out today would be laughable if it wasn’t so outright shameful and harmful,” said Care in Action, Community Change Action, Indivisible, MoveOn, and Greenpeace in a joint statement Monday.
The advocacy groups called on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to “reject this plan outright.”
“The plan put forth by Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans will do nothing but double down on the failed policies that put corporate profits before workers and families, and that helped get us here in the first place,” the groups said. “It is not a good faith starting point to negotiations.”
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) confirmed to reporters Monday that the plan being crafted in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) office will include a cut to the payroll tax — a funding mechanism for Social Security and Medicare. “It’s one of the issues that we’re proposing,” said McCarthy.
An anonymous White House official told Roll Call that the Republican proposal under consideration would defer payment of the payroll tax to a later date. Congress would then have the option of waiving the payback requirement with separate legislation.
Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, said in a statement Monday that the Trump-GOP push for a payroll tax cut amounts to an effort to “raid” the Social Security system’s “dedicated revenue as a pathway to destroying it.”
“If the money lost in payroll contributions is replaced with general revenue, Social Security will still be a target,” warned Altman. “Currently, Social Security doesn’t add a penny to the deficit. Raiding its dedicated revenue is a set up to the claim that it must be cut in the name of reining in the debt! McCarthy’s statement today means that every Republican member of Congress supports defunding Social Security — unless they quickly and explicitly denounce their party’s plan to raid our earned benefits.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was among the few Republicans who publicly voiced skepticism Monday about the payroll tax cut, calling the proposal a “public relations problem” for the GOP.
“Social Security people think we’re raiding the Social Security fund,” said Grassley, to which Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson responded:
Because they are planning on raiding it. They are going to take the dedicated revenue away from Social Security, the definition of raiding. https://t.co/Z4TRARlXA3
— Alex “Test, Trace, Isolate” Lawson (@alaw202) July 20, 2020
Schumer and Pelosi are expected to meet with White House officials Tuesday to formally kick off negotiations over the stimulus legislation. The Trump administration is advocating a relief package that contains “roughly $1 trillion in new programs, though officials are expected to use budget gimmicks to make the initial package slightly larger,” the Post reported.
By comparison, the $3 trillion HEROES Act passed by the Democrat-controlled House in May proposed more than $1 trillion just for state and local governments as they face pandemic-induced budget crises.
“The bill is expected to omit new aid that Democrats have sought for cities and states, instead allowing governors and local leaders more flexibility to spend the $150 billion already allocated,” the Post noted.
The GOP plan will also likely include another round of $1,200 direct stimulus payments and a cut to the $600-per-week increase in unemployment benefits, which is set to expire at the end of the week. During a private White House meeting on Monday, according to the Post, “Trump criticized the enhanced unemployment benefit, saying it never should have been agreed to in the first place.”
“From what we understand from press reports, McConnell’s bill will prioritize corporate special interests over workers and Main Street businesses,” Schumer said in a floor speech Monday afternoon. “It will fail to adequately address the worsening spread of the virus. There are currently between 20 million and 30 million unemployed Americans, and from all accounts the Republican bill will not do nearly enough for them.”
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) warned on Twitter that reducing the boosted unemployment insurance (UI) payments will slash the incomes of 30 million Americans who are currently relying on the payments to meet basic needs.
Instead of renewing supercharged unemployment benefits, which have kept our economy afloat for months, Senate Republicans want to:
1) Cut the income of 30 million Americans
2) Give everyone else a fake tax cut they’ll have to repay after the election https://t.co/8f2HngyluU
— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) July 20, 2020
Josh Bivens, director of research at the Economic Policy Institute, said Monday that it “sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid — enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments.”
“Hard not see all of this as Republicans in the Senate and administration having given up trying to fix problems and shifting to attempts to hobble the political prospects of the next Congress and administration,” Bivens added. “We deserve a lot better than this.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.