Moscow — Russia may be lining up to support a US-sponsored resolution calling for tougher sanctions against Iran in the United Nations Security Council, but that does not seem likely to interfere with key deals between Iran and Russia. Russian contractors will likely complete construction of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant, it was announced this week, and Russia may continue to sell sophisticated arms to the Islamic Republic.
Moscow’s willingness to back the new sanctions, which include a partial arms embargo and financial strictures, represents a significant evolution of Russian policy from its previous rejection of such strong measures.
But there are limits. President Dmitry Medvedev’s wish to move toward a more pro-Western orbit, outlined in a leaked foreign policy review last week has already run up against resistance from vested interests in Russia’s military-industrial establishment, experts say.
“Relations with the US have become more important than relations with Iran. Medvedev has changed the priorities, and you do see the results” says Viktor Kremeniuk, deputy director of the official Institute of USA-Canada Studies in Moscow. “But that doesn’t mean Russia’s preparing to abandon Iran. Medvedev cannot go against important Russian lobbies, who have vested interests that can’t be ignored.”
Sanctions Will Not Stop Anti-Aircraft Systems From Reaching Iran
On Friday Mikhail Margelov, the head of the foreign affairs commission of the Federation Council, Russia’s upper house of parliament, insisted that any sanctions resolution will not prevent Russia from honoring an oft-delayed contract to deliver advanced, long-range S-300 anti-aircraft systems to Iran.
“The draft [sanctions resolution] will not hit current contracts between Russia and Iran,” the independent Interfax news agency quoted him as saying. “It should be remembered that Russia is a responsible seller of its products on foreign markets and we are not interested in the militarization of the Middle East.”
The $1 billion Bushehr plant on the Persian Gulf, which has also been the subject of repeated delays, will be completed and put into operation within three months, the head of the state-run atomic power agency, Sergei Kiriyenko, told journalists on Thursday.
“We expect the nuclear power plant will be launched by August if everything goes according to plan,” Mr. Kiriyenko said. “The resolution on Iran being drawn up [in the Security Council] will not affect these plans.”
Iran-Russia Relations ‘Growing Worse’
But some Russian experts argue that such investments are now largely symbolic, meant to emphasize Moscow’s “independent position” rather than reflecting any large, ongoing Russian economic interests in Iran.
“Our relations with Iran have been growing worse since the presidential elections in Iran last year,” says Vladimir Yevseyev, an expert with the Center for International Security in Moscow. “Our trade turnover with Iran is low, around $3 billion annually.” He adds that Russian energy companies Lukoil and Gazprom have largely departed from Iran, despite big hopes for cooperation in previous years.
The same is true of nuclear cooperation, where former talk of building up to eight Russian nuclear power plants in Iran has been scaled back to just completing Bushehr, says Alexei Malashenko, a Russia expert with the Carnegie Center in Moscow.
“They’ve announced intentions to finish Bushehr at last, probably because doing so will free Russia’s hands [with respect to Iran],” he says. “This has been a problem for us for too long.”
Russia Puts Faith in Obama
Mr. Malashenko says Medvedev’s new West-centered foreign policy approach is based on big hopes that President Barack Obama means what he says about his policies of greater engagement with Russia and not launching a military strike against Iran’s nuclear program.
“At the moment in Moscow they are shaping policies to fit Obama’s line, and everyone is very sure that [tougher sanctions against Iran] are not leading to war,” he says. “Russian leaders are absolutely certain that Obama has ruled out military action against Iran.”
Experts say that Russia also showed its chops as an international team player by participating in the deal brokered this week by Turkey and Brazil to exchange low-enriched Iranian uranium for fuel rods to be used in a US-built medical reactor in Tehran.
“This issue was probably discussed during Medvedev’s visit to Turkey last week, and the Brazilian president’s visit to Moscow earlier this week,” says Mr. Yevseyev. “It is Russia that will likely carry out the enrichment of uranium to be supplied to Iran under that deal.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.