A GOP-sponsored bill in the Oklahoma state legislature would allocate space at the state capitol for building a monument dedicated to the Ten Commandments, despite the state Supreme Court ruling seven years ago that a similar monument was unconstitutional.
Senate Bill 1858, sponsored by state Sen. David Bullard (R), would require prominent display of such a monument, which espouses principles contained in Jewish and Christian scripture, both inside and outside of the capitol building. The bill also stipulates that the monument cannot be moved after it is erected without a three-quarters vote in the state legislature and the governor’s approval.
Designs for the monument would have to be finalized within one year of passage of the bill. Any person who damages the monument would be charged with a felony crime. The bill also authorizes the state attorney general “to prepare and present a legal defense of the display” in the event that the monument’s constitutionality is questioned.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which, through case law over the years also applies to the states, forbids the establishment or endorsement of a state or national religion. In 2015, the state Supreme Court found that a different Ten Commandments display at the capitol was in violation of that standard, and soon after a judge ordered its removal.
Before that display’s removal, several groups, such as the Satanic Temple, sought to showcase the state’s hypocrisy in endorsing Christian imagery by proposing their own monuments, including one of Satan depicted as a goat-headed deity called Baphomet. After the state Supreme Court ruling on the Ten Commandments, plans to assemble that statue were abandoned.
Although Bullard’s bill stipulates that only donated funds can be used to build the proposed monument (likely to avoid complaints that state taxpayer dollars were used to support it), the bill also orders state lawmakers to use their work hours to discuss the design of the monument, amounting to at least some government expenditures.
Bullard believes that his bill and a Ten Commandments monument can stand up to constitutional scrutiny due to a 2022 Supreme Court case in which the conservative majority ruled in favor of allowing a public school football coach to lead prayers with his players before games. But critics of the proposal say that this reasoning likely won’t hold up in court.
“It has been pretty well established that public grounds and public money should not be used for promotion of a single religious viewpoint,” said Veronica Laizure, who serves as the board president of the American Civil Liberties Union-Oklahoma as well as the deputy director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). “This is clearly doing that.”
Angry, shocked, overwhelmed? Take action: Support independent media.
We’ve borne witness to a chaotic first few months in Trump’s presidency.
Over the last months, each executive order has delivered shock and bewilderment — a core part of a strategy to make the right-wing turn feel inevitable and overwhelming. But, as organizer Sandra Avalos implored us to remember in Truthout last November, “Together, we are more powerful than Trump.”
Indeed, the Trump administration is pushing through executive orders, but — as we’ve reported at Truthout — many are in legal limbo and face court challenges from unions and civil rights groups. Efforts to quash anti-racist teaching and DEI programs are stalled by education faculty, staff, and students refusing to comply. And communities across the country are coming together to raise the alarm on ICE raids, inform neighbors of their civil rights, and protect each other in moving shows of solidarity.
It will be a long fight ahead. And as nonprofit movement media, Truthout plans to be there documenting and uplifting resistance.
As we undertake this life-sustaining work, we appeal for your support. Please, if you find value in what we do, join our community of sustainers by making a monthly or one-time gift.