Republicans on Capitol Hill have vastly downplayed the importance of former President Donald Trump twice stating in the past week that he wants dictatorial powers on the first day of his next term in office, should he win the 2024 presidential election.
Trump’s comments, which presume he’s going to win what will be, by all accounts, a tightly contested race, were initially made last week during a town hall event on Fox News hosted by Sean Hannity. The Fox News host had asked Trump to respond to criticisms that, were he allowed to be in the White House again, he would govern in an autocratic manner.
Trump avoided answering the question the first time he was asked it, but eventually responded to Hannity’s query, telling him he wouldn’t rule as a dictator “other than day one.” Trump said he would want to have that kind of power — unprecedented in U.S. history — in order to enact xenophobic immigration laws, such as building a wall on the border with Mexico, and opening up oil drilling sites across the country.
“After that, I’m not a dictator,” Trump swore.
Trump has engaged in similar anti-democratic rhetoric in the past. In December of last year, for example, he called for the temporary “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution” to reinstall him as president of the United States. While in office, he also wrongly claimed that Article II of the U.S. Constitution — which frames the powers and limits of the presidency — allowed him “the right to do whatever [he] want[ed].”
Taken together, these types of comments from Trump — as well as his insistence that Republicans (including his former Vice President Mike Pence) baselessly and illegally overturn his election loss in the Electoral College certification ceremony on January 6, 2021 — suggest that his comments about only taking on dictatorial powers temporarily would in reality possibly last indefinitely, especially since the actions he’s saying he would take would require more than one day to successfully implement.
Nevertheless, over the weekend Republican leaders in Congress played down Trump’s comments.
“It’s entertainment. We’ve been around him long enough, it’s entertaining,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said with a grin, responding to Trump’s words.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) told reporters that Trump’s comments were “a joke,” and Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota) dismissed them as “typical Trump rhetoric.” Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky) also defended Trump’s words, describing the former president’s calls to be dictator for a day as “unique expressions.”
Those defenses are overshadowed by the fact that Trump doubled down on his desire to be a dictator on Saturday evening while addressing a conservative soiree in New York City (an event that was also attended by far right figures such as Trump’s former political adviser Steve Bannon, as well as Harald Vilimsky, the secretary-general of Austria’s Eurosceptic Freedom Party, a party founded by former Nazis).
Trump quibbled with the media’s depiction of him saying he wanted to be a dictator. “I didn’t say that, I said I want to be a dictator for one day,” Trump said.
Critics rightly point out that granting a person dictatorial powers, even for just one day, is never consistent with the idea of democracy — and that, with Trump especially, it would be a gamble over whether such powers would be relinquished once that time period concluded.
“One-day dictatorships are not okay,” MSNBC producer Steve Benen said. “The idea that the Republican’s position is somehow tolerable because he only wants to exercise authoritarian rule for a brief period is not just utterly bonkers, it reflects an inherent hostility to the bedrock principles that serve as the foundation for the American experiment.”
Harvard Law professor emeritus Laurence Tribe similarly questioned the notion that any rational person could believe Trump was only joking about his desire to be an autocrat.
“If you think Trump is joking, think again,” Tribe said. “His snarky boast that he’ll be ‘Dictator — but Only on Day One’ — needs to be accompanied by the tune to ‘Days That Last Forever.'”
Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian who is an expert on authoritarian regimes and figures, noted that Trump’s calls for a dictatorship would benefit others, a hallmark action of individuals seeking such powers.
“Wall and drill: profits for fossil fuel and security industries. This is a man who knows how to forge ‘authoritarian bargains’ with elites who can cash out during his presidency,” Ben-Ghiat said on social media.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.