Skip to content Skip to footer

Republican Kicks Barbara Lee Out of Hearing on Cuba Over Pro-Diplomacy Views

“You are doing exactly what you say the Cuban government is,” Lee said.

Rep. Barbara Lee attends a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on January 26, 2023.

While making a show of decrying dictators on Thursday, a Republican House member kicked progressive Rep. Barbara Lee (D-California) out of a subcommittee hearing over her calls for diplomacy and normalizing relations with Cuba, spurring criticism over the Republican participating in the same anti-democratic behaviors she was supposedly denouncing.

Lee posted a video on social media of her being removed from a hearing by the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, saying that not only did Republicans give her the boot, they also cut the sound in the livestream of the hearing when she objected to the removal and defended herself.

The removal was ordered by the subcommittee chair, Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, a Republican from Florida, who accused Lee of “unequivocal support of Fidel Castro” — something that Republicans have long accused Lee of with little evidence other than her desire to restore diplomacy with Cuba — and spreading “communist propaganda.”

“I am an African American woman who has a point of view, where, in a democracy, those points of views are allowed. And you are doing exactly what you say the Cuban government is … denying me the opportunity to present my point of view. What is wrong with this picture?” Lee said.

Salazar doubled down and dodged the question. “I would love to have this same type of political discourse in Havana,” she said, while blocking this “type of political discourse” from happening in the U.S. Capitol.

“Let’s have it in Havana if we normalize relations,” Lee shot back.

Later, as Lee spoke of the merits of diplomatic relations, Salazar interjected to say, “Fidel Castro has been the worst dictator that the hemisphere has seen since the arrival of Christopher Columbus,” perhaps ignoring the U.S.’s role in funding a wide variety of brutal dictatorships across the world.

“Madam chair, he’s been dead for 10 years,” another person in the room quipped.

Lee is a former member of the subcommittee and was invited to the hearing to speak on Cuba and diplomacy with the country, an issue that she has long championed with the goal of easing the U.S.’s decades-long repression and destabilization of the country.

Democrats who witnessed the incident said that Salazar’s move is potentially “unprecedented” and that it is emblematic of the very political repression and dissent that Salazar was posturing about.

“This goes against the fundamental principles of Congress,” Rep. Ro Khanna (California), who is the subcommittee’s top ranking Democrat and who invited Lee to speak, wrote on social media. “We should be engaging with those we disagree with, not removing them from hearings.”

“I was grateful [Representative Salazar] invited me to join her hearing as we both fight for human rights in Cuba. But I refused to participate when my colleague [Representative Lee] was shut out due to her opposing views,” said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Florida). “In democracies, we debate freely and openly, even when we disagree.”

Later during the hearing, Rep. Greg Stanton (D-Arizona) read the remarks that Lee was planning on delivering on her behalf.

“The Cuban people want to build a freer society, but the United States policy is based on the idea that, if we punish them just a little more, we will make them succeed,” Stanton recited from Lee’s remarks. “We see the failure of this upside down policy everywhere — more Cubans are fleeing the island than ever before, adding to the humanitarian crisis. Do we really want to exacerbate a situation where life in Cuba is so unbearable that people are forced to leave?”

Salazar’s move is just the latest in Republicans’ quest to silence their political opponents and censor history that doesn’t support their views. Republicans in the House have particularly honed in on progressives like Lee, and in recent months have censured Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) and voted to remove Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) from committee for the lawmakers’ views on Palestine. They have also attempted to censure Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York), seemingly just because they disagree with him generally, under the flimsy guise of him errantly pulling a fire alarm in the Capitol.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 130 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy