During his tenure as president, Donald Trump reportedly sought advice from his aides on how to use his executive powers to stop late-night comedy shows and hosts, including “Saturday Night Live” (SNL), Jimmy Kimmel and others, from making jokes at his expense, according to reporting from The Daily Beast.
Trump’s displeasure and frustrations over entertainers making fun of him are no secret, as he has frequently sounded off against them through social media (until he was banned from several platforms earlier this year), both before and during his presidency. In March 2019, for example, Trump, reacting to an SNL rerun that was airing at the time, knocked the actors on the show in a series of tweets as being “not funny” and having “no talent” after they had performed skits about him and his administration in that episode.
Trump also complained in those tweets that it was unfair that the “other side” wasn’t afforded the ability to respond to jokes about him. “Like an advertisement without consequences,” Trump said.
“Should Federal Election Commission and/or FCC [the Federal Communications Commission] look into this?” he added.
Trump was criticized for suggesting that a federal agency should be involved in trying to limit satire on TV programs, which would amount to interfering in a form of protected speech in the United States. But it now appears that Trump actually sought to pursue the matter further, as The Daily Beast reported on Tuesday, by seeking to find out if he could use executive agencies and departments to stop or threaten comedy programs that poked fun at him and his administration.
According to two people familiar with the matter, Trump asked his advisers in early 2019 what the courts, the FCC, and even the Department of Justice (DOJ) could do about comedians making jokes about him on television.
Trump asked specifically about the “equal time” rule, a provision in federal election law that requires over-the-air television stations to give opposing political candidates or issue advocacy organizations the same amount of screen time. But that rule doesn’t apply to comedians who joke about political figures.
Trump was repeatedly told, per those two sources, that satire is protected speech, and that he couldn’t stop networks from broadcasting comedians making jokes about him. According to one of those sources — a lawyer working within the White House at that time — Trump asked them if “something else can be done about it.” That person said they’d “look into it,” but never followed up on the inquiry from Trump.
This is the second instance in as many weeks where it’s been revealed that Trump sought to overstep his authority as president in alarming ways.
Last week, it was reported that the House Oversight Committee had obtained documents detailing how the Trump White House also sought to pressure the DOJ to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, including pushing the department to look into a baseless conspiracy theory alleging that facilities in Italy used CIA satellites to change the outcomes of races in several states. The Trump administration had also drafted a legal brief it had intended to submit to the Supreme Court, demanding that justices “declare that the Electoral College votes cast” in six swing states that the former president had lost “cannot be counted” in the final tally.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.