Skip to content Skip to footer

Rand Paul Says Legal Campaign Methods Are How Dems “Steal” Elections

Paul quoted a conservative news article that discussed how Democrats successfully (and legally) won Wisconsin in 2020.

Sen. Rand Paul speaks with a reporter in the Ohio Clock Corridor in the Capitol on September 30, 2021.

On Monday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) shared a tweet suggesting that Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election — but when describing the tactics Democrats used to “steal” the election, he described exactly how democratically free elections work.

In his tweet, Paul cited a Washington Examiner article that explored how Democrats were able to flip Wisconsin from Trump in 2016 to Biden in 2020.

“How to steal an election: ‘Seeding an area heavy with potential Democratic votes with as many absentee ballots as possible, targeting and convincing potential voters to complete them in a legally valid way, and then harvesting and counting the results,'” Paul wrote.

Notably, the “steal” that Paul described in his tweet is simply how elections work — the candidate that wins has to convince a plurality of voters to choose them over competing candidates, and to cast their vote in a “legally valid” way.

In October, the nonpartisan Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau reported that while some election laws and policies should be adjusted, there hadn’t been any widespread fraud affecting the outcome of the state election.

Many observers on social media noted that Paul used the word “steal” in error — and that he was simply upset that Biden won Wisconsin using fair and legal campaign methods.

“If I’m following, you mean Democrats persuade people to vote for us, and then — hear me out here — people vote for us? Yeah, we did that,” wrote Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California).

“This is literally how elections have been legally conducted in America for half a century,” wrote Jason Johnson, a journalism professor and MSNBC contributor. “Sooooo campaigning is ‘Stealing’ when a Republican loses?”

Several social media users observed that Paul’s words were more revealing than he probably intended them to be — and that his tweet demonstrated Republicans’ skepticism toward legitimate voting practices that have been used for decades.

“Not surprising a Republican thinks a normal voting process is stealing an election,” wrote journalist Jemele Hill.

“This sounds like a bit,” said voting rights journalist Daniel Nichanian, “but it’s quite the window into the conservative mind to say that ‘convincing’ people to legally complete a ballot & increasing turnout is election theft.”

Political strategist Dante Atkins agreed. “What Rand Paul is expressing here is the fundamental conservative belief that people in cities intrinsically don’t have the right to have a voice, and that if Democrats win, it’s inherently a flawed result,” he wrote.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.