Skip to content Skip to footer

Rand Paul Says “Hatred for Trump” Is Why Med Experts Oppose Ivermectin for COVID

No study has provided any evidence that the cattle deworming medication can prevent or “cure” coronavirus.

Republican Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) questions Anthony Fauci (not pictured), Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing on May 11, 2021.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) told a Kentucky crowd Friday that “hatred” for former President Donald Trump was obstructing legitimate study of a medication, used primarily for treating parasites in farm animals, for use against coronavirus.

“The hatred for Trump deranged these people so much, they’re unwilling to objectively study it,” Paul said while meeting with constituents in Cold Spring, Kentucky. He provided no proof for his claims.

There is no evidence showing that Ivermectin, including its form for human consumption, can reduce the chances of contracting coronavirus or effectively treat someone infected with COVID. Still, the product has sold out in many locations after vaccination opponents began hyping the product in recent weeks.

Paul, who is an ophthalmologist that withdrew from the American Board of Ophthalmology to declare himself “self-certified” prior to entering politics, said he’s not sure if Ivermectin “works,” but that he keeps an “open mind” about it.

Refuting the GOP senator’s comments, the U.S. National Library of Medicine said that studies have been conducted on Ivermectin, and have shown no proof of its efficacy in treating COVID-19. The pharmaceutical company Merck, which manufactures the drug, has also spoken out against its use for treating or preventing coronavirus.

Merck noted in February of this year that there is “no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect [of Ivermectin] against COVID-19,” as well as “no meaningful evidence for [its] clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients” with the virus.

The increased off-label use of the drug has prompted several state agencies, as well as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to issue a warning against using it to treat or prevent COVID-19, as the drug comes with serious side effects.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the FDA wrote in a blunt tweet earlier this month.

Senator Paul has a history of peddling lies about the pandemic, and has had his YouTube account temporarily suspended for spreading false theories on COVID. Paul has also been a poor example for preventing infection, as he frequently refuses to wear masks, even though they’ve been demonstrated to effectively prevent the spread of the coronavirus. Paul has also clashed with infectious diseases experts, including White House health adviser Anthony Fauci.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.