As ThinkProgress has chronicled at length, Senate Republicans are engaged in an unprecedented campaign of obstruction against President Obama's nominees. As one prong of this campaign, they forced the Senate to hold brief “pro forma” sessions every three days in an attempt to cut off President Obama’s power to make recess appointments.
As Jonathan Bernstein explains, the basis of this tactic is a nearly 20-year-old DOJ opinion concluding that “a recess must exceed three days to count for the purposes of making recess appointments.” Since that opinion was drafted, however, a higher authority has weighed in on the question and reached the opposite result. In 2004, President Bush recess appointed Judge William Pryor to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. This led to Evans v. Stephens, the only court of appeals opinion to examine how long a recess must last before the president may make a recess appointment. Evans‘ holding unambiguously permits President Obama to make a recess appointment right now:
The challengers have used both history and textual analysis to support their contentions that the ten- or eleven-day break in the Senate’s Session that underlies Judge Pryor’s appointment was not a “Recess” within the meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause. We have considered all of the arguments. But the arguments are not so strong as to persuade us that [President Bush's] interpretation is incorrect. […] The Constitution, on its face, does not establish a minimum time that an authorized break in the Senate must last to give legal force to the President’s appointment power under the Recess Appointments Clause. And we do not set the limit today.
To be sure, the Eleventh Circuit is not the Supreme Court, so it is possible that the justices would take a different view of the issue. But such an outcome it highly unlikely. The vote in Evans was 7 to 1 with one additional judge voting to pass the question on to the Supreme Court without deciding the case. In other words, 7 of the 8 judges to consider the question concluded that the president could make a recess appointment even if the recess only lasted five minutes. There is also good reason to believe that the Supreme Court would simply reject any challenge to President Obama’s recess appointments as a “political question.”
So the highest legal authority to weigh in on the recess appointments power said that President Obama can make a recess appointment right now, and it did so by an overwhelming margin. Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are slowly shutting down the entire federal government by draining it of long-needed personnel. The newly-created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau isn’t even capable of performing many of its duties because it lacks a director.
President Obama can end this today by recess appointing that director.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.