Polling on American voters’ opinion of GOP vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance is causing political observers to question whether Republicans are having buyer’s remorse over selecting him to run alongside Donald Trump in the 2024 election.
Trump hasn’t yet voiced any negative feelings toward his running mate, whom he personally selected and the party confirmed through a vote at its convention last week. But the selection of the Ohio Republican senator, who doesn’t even have two years under his belt in public office, was a curious one — Vance isn’t from a swing state, and he isn’t viewed as likely to bring in new support from voting blocs that Trump needs to win.
Indeed, the selection “was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” wrote The Atlantic’s Tim Alberta, who noted that the strategy was developed prior to President Joe Biden dropping out as the Democratic nominee.
Now that Vice President Kamala Harris is the presumptive nominee for Democrats, Vance’s selection doesn’t seem to be very strategic. Meanwhile, polling is demonstrating that as voters get to know more about Vance, they become less receptive to him and his views.
Some Republicans have privately expressed regret over Trump picking Vance.
“The road got a lot harder. He was the only pick that wasn’t the safe pick. And I think everyone has now realized that,” one House Republican told Axios.
“On the whole, the feeling is: doesn’t add much,” another member of the House GOP conference said. “And now with Kamala at the top, the capacity to have expanded the map a little bit … would have been much more beneficial.”
Vance has, in fact, become something of a liability for Trump. Aggregate polling data collected by CNN’s senior political data reporter Harry Enten noted that Vance has a net favorability rating of -6 points. That number is the lowest of any vice presidential nominee for either major party since 1980, and the first time such a nominee has been in the net-negative range in the week after their party’s national convention. (Vice presidential nominees have seen, on average, a +19 net favorability rating in the days after their conventions were held.)
An Economist/YouGov poll, published after Enten’s aggregate was compiled, exemplifies the GOP’s problems with Vance. Among Americans overall, only 34 percent give him a favorable rating, while 42 percent view him unfavorably, a net rating of -8 points. Nearly a quarter of respondents (23 percent) said they didn’t know enough about Vance to form an opinion.
“Frankly, I don’t really understand the pick,” Enten said recently on the decision to select Vance.
Vance has done himself no favors recently by making public appearances alongside polarizing figures — at a recent campaign rally, for example, he was introduced by a state representative of his hometown of Middletown, Ohio. That lawmaker suggested that a civil war may be needed if Trump and Vance lose the presidential race to Democrats in the fall, a notion that Vance failed to disavow.
If Trump and/or Republicans eventually determine that they do have buyer’s remorse over Vance, there isn’t much they can do about it: Republican National Committee (RNC) bylaws do not allow a person at the top of the ticket, nor the party itself, to remove a vice presidential candidate once they are selected. Trump could pressure Vance, who has frequently kowtowed to him in the past, to voluntarily step aside, after which the RNC could hold a meeting to select a replacement vice presidential candidate (likely someone who Trump had already selected beforehand). But if Vance doesn’t cooperate, the RNC can’t force him to leave the ticket.
There is one caveat: The party could amend its bylaws, if three-fourths of committee members vote to do so, to allow a new provision that would let them remove a vice presidential running mate. But if that’s the route they want to take, it will have to be done quickly, as deadlines for naming the nominees in a number of states are fast approaching.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy