Skip to content Skip to footer

Poll: Plurality of Americans Would Support DC Statehood If Backed by Residents

Since the nation's inception, residents of Washington, D.C. have not had congressional representation.

Activists rally for voting rights and DC statehood as they block traffic on Pennsylvania Avenue SE on December 7, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

A new poll shows that a plurality of Americans would support making Washington, D.C. the 51st U.S. state if its residents voted in favor of the measure.

An Economist/YouGov poll published earlier this week asked respondents whether they would back D.C. statehood if it was supported by the district’s residents. A plurality (41 percent) said they would support the idea, while just over a third (36 percent) said they would oppose it. Nearly a quarter of Americans (23 percent) were unsure.

According to the U.S. Constitution, D.C. is a federal district and therefore not entitled to congressional representation. (It does have one non-voting delegate, Democratic Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton.) An amendment to the Constitution in 1961 allowed residents to vote in presidential races, but otherwise, the district’s residents are taxed without federal representation.

The House of Representatives passed a proposal in April 2021 that would have granted D.C. statehood, allowing a large portion of the district to become a state while keeping parts (such as Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court building, and national monuments) under federal control. (The constitution requires that there is a federal district, but in terms of its size only stipulates that it cannot be greater than 10 square miles.)

The text of that legislation would have renamed the district to honor abolitionist Fredrick Douglass rather than Christopher Columbus, admitting the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, into the U.S. “on an equal footing with the other States in all respects whatever.” This would have given the state two U.S. senators and a single representative until the 2030 Census, at which time the number could increase due to population size, compared to the rest of the nation.

The bill passed the House without any GOP support, but faced difficult odds in the Senate, where Republicans could use a filibuster to block its passage. Sen. Joe Manchin, a right-wing Democrat from West Virginia, also signaled his opposition to granting D.C. statehood, effectively killing the bill. Because Republicans will be taking over the House in the next congressional session, the prospects of Democrats reintroducing the bill are slim.

Republicans are largely opposed to D.C. statehood for political reasons, as the district has voted for the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since its residents were granted the right to vote. Notably, the district also has a higher percentage of non-white residents than the rest of the nation, on average, as 45.8 percent of D.C. residents are Black, 11.5 percent are Latinx, and only 37.3 percent are white, according to the latest Census statistics.

While the district has voted blue in every presidential race, not every elector from D.C. has voted for a Democrat. In 2000, a “faithless elector” — a person who is designated to serve in the Electoral College but whose vote doesn’t represent the will of their constituents — abstained from voting in protest of the district’s lack of congressional representation.

The vast majority of Washington, D.C. residents support statehood. In 2016, the district held a non-binding referendum on whether statehood should be considered. More than 78 percent of voters said “yes,” while around 13 percent — less than one in seven voters — said “no.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy