A new poll published this week demonstrates that a majority of Ohio residents support expanding abortion rights beyond the six-week ban that’s currently on the books, and will likely back a voter-led initiative that’s set to appear on the ballot.
Voters will decide this fall whether the state constitution should be amended to enshrine abortion rights, as a signature-driven initiative surpassed the 400,000 signatures needed to place the question on November’s general election ballot, garnering 700,000 signatures in total.
The proposed amendment states that “every individual has a right to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions, including but not limited to decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing one’s own pregnancy, miscarriage care, and abortion.” The amendment would protect abortion rights up to fetal viability, generally assumed to be around 22-24 weeks after a person becomes pregnant.
In a USA Today/Suffolk University poll published this week, 58 percent of Ohio voters said they wanted the measure to pass, while only 32 percent said they were opposed to the amendment.
In almost every demographic the poll examined, including categories based on age, race, education level and gender, support for the measure outweighed opposition, often by double-digit margins. Only on the question of political affiliation was there one group — Republican voters — that stood opposed to the amendment, but even a third of those respondents said they backed passage of the initiative, despite their party’s vehement opposition to reproductive rights.
If the amendment passes, it would undo a 2019 “trigger law” in the state that went into effect last summer after the U.S. Supreme Court upended federal abortion rights previously protected by the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Currently, Ohio’s abortion law bars the procedure after the sixth week of pregnancy, a timeframe in which many people are not even aware they are pregnant.
Although the measure appears likely to pass, it could be blocked if a separate constitutional amendment question passes in August.
In response to the abortion rights initiative, which is set for a vote in the general election, Republican lawmakers in the state legislature placed their own question on the primary election ballot, which, if passed, would mean that all future ballot questions must obtain a supermajority of 60 percent voter support in order to become an official state constitutional amendment.
Many have condemned the action as a blatant attempt to block the abortion initiative, with critics alleging that Republicans placed the measure on the primary ballot so it could pass during a race that many voters in the state don’t participate in. (Only 8 percent of eligible voters took part in Ohio’s 2022 primary election.)
Even if the legislative-driven measure is successful, however, there’s a good chance the abortion rights amendment could still pass in November. Given that the poll has a margin of error of 4.4 points, it’s possible, right now, that more than 60 percent of voters in Ohio are supportive of the abortion rights amendment. If that number is maintained into the fall, the measure could pass, regardless of whether or not the primary race’s ballot question passes.
If the initiative succeeds and the abortion rights amendment doesn’t pass by 60 percent or more votes, activists will likely seek to bring the matter to the courts, as the signature drive began well before the August primary ballot question was established. Ohioans who signed the abortion petition for a ballot initiative supported it with the idea that a “50-percent plus one vote” threshold was all that was necessary for it to pass. The judiciary might rule that this is still all that’s required — even if the August initiative passes — because that stipulation was part of what inspired people to take part in the signature drive.
The initiatives could also have implications for the presidential election next year. If the abortion rights amendment passes by wide margins, for example, presidential candidates (particularly Republicans) coming through the bellwether state would likely tip-toe around the issue to avoid alienating voters. It could also help pro-abortion candidates win in a state that has trended “red” in the past several election cycles.
Several abortion-related elections have taken place across the country since the fall of Roe, with virtually all of them showing that most Americans believe abortion rights should be protected.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy