As the U.S. defense budget continues to soar to record heights, even the Pentagon is coming out against the requirement that defense officials submit mandatory funding “wish lists” each year, a practice that tacks on tens of billions of dollars to already sky-high budget requests.
In response to efforts by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and Department of Defense Comptroller Michael McCord both came out against the requirement for officials to send Congress an “unfunded priorities list” on top of the existing budget request. These wish lists, as they’re often called, amount to the yearly budgets of entire agencies; in 2024, the Pentagon asked for $24 billion on top of the $773 billion for its regular budget.
The leaders say that they support Warren’s efforts to repeal the requirement for the agency to submit “unfunded priorities lists.” Anti-war advocates and opponents of the requirement — which was implemented under President Donald Trump in 2017 — say that it represents yet another way to add absurd amounts of money to the defense budget.
In a letter to Warren sent last week, McCord wrote that Congress should “reconsider the merits of this approach,” and that having leaders “submit priorities for additional funding absent the benefit of weighing costs and benefits across the department is not an effective way to illuminate our top joint priorities.”
Then, in a hearing on Tuesday, Austin appeared to admit that the label of “unfunded” is a misnomer and that, indeed, the Pentagon would be just fine with only the hundreds of billions of dollars it gets in funding every year. In an exchange with Warren in the Senate, Austin said that the Pentagon was able to carry out all of its operations with much lesser use of the wish lists during the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and that the agency is able to craft a budget without the add-ons.
“Secretary Austin, does DoD have sufficient tools to address emerging threats without relying on the unfunded priorities list?” Warren asked.
“We do. And again, we account for that as we build the budget,” the Secretary of Defense said.
Warren said in a statement that such wish lists only undermine the budget-making process, allowing the Pentagon to circumvent normal procedures to grab more funding from federal coffers. “The budget process requires making tough choices and setting clear priorities, and requesting billions of dollars in ‘unfunded requirements’ has been undermining that process,” she said. “I’m glad that DoD agrees we need to repeal the requirement to provide these ‘wish lists’.”
The Pentagon’s support for ending the wish lists makes it abundantly clear that Congress is continuing the practice solely because lawmakers have a vested interest in funneling billions more to the Defense Department and private defense contractors; theoretically, the Pentagon’s stance should appeal to the deficit and fiscal responsibility hawks who endlessly criticize welfare spending while approving trillions of dollars for war and imperialism.
Anti-war advocates say ending the mandate would be an important step toward the ultimate goal of decreasing U.S. defense spending.
“These wish lists result in tens of billions of dollars in Pentagon budget increases for congressional pet projects and pork. No other agency has a mandated opportunity for a second bite at the budget apple,” said Lindsay Koshgarian, director of the National Priorities Project, in a statement emailed to Truthout. “Ending the wish list requirement — and ending the wish lists themselves — would be an important first step toward bringing Pentagon spending under control.”
Next year’s defense budget is set, yet again, to reach a record high. President Joe Biden has called for a towering $886 billion in military spending for 2024 — and Congress will likely tack on tens of billions more to that budget, as lawmakers customarily do, inching the country closer to the grim milestone of a $1 trillion annual military budget.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy