Skip to content Skip to footer

Pence Criticized Over Call for “Expedited” Death Penalty for Mass Shooters

Experts on violence widely agree that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent.

Former Vice President Mike Pence speaks at the Eagle Point Park Lodge on July 30, 2023, in Clinton, Iowa.

On Sunday, former Vice President Mike Pence — who is also running for the GOP nomination for the 2024 presidential election — reacted to a shooting over the weekend in Jacksonville, Florida, by suggesting that mass shooters should be subjected to an “expedited” death penalty process.

“Justice delayed is justice denied,” Pence said on CBS News’s “Face the Nation” program, “and I’m calling for an expedited federal death penalty for anyone engaged in a mass shooting like took place in Jacksonville.”

“We’ve got to send a message to anyone that has evil in their hearts, that there is no chance for them to spend the rest of their life behind bars, that they’re going to meet their fate in months, not years,” Pence added.

Pence didn’t elaborate on how his plan would work to deter mass shootings. The gunman in the Jacksonville shooting, who killed three Black people near a Dollar General store, killed himself when police arrived at the scene. Police later uncovered a racist manifesto written by the shooter.

“Mike Pence’s solution to gun violence is handing down a death penalty to a guy who literally killed himself,” said Craig Harrington, research director at Media Matters, in response to the video of Pence’s words.

A New York Times examination of mass shootings showed that a quarter of 433 different active shooting events examined (25.4 percent) ended with the assailant taking their own life. An FBI analysis from 2014 placed the figure at a higher rate, with 40 percent of mass shooters dying by suicide.

Conservative politicians like Pence have long argued that the death penalty serves as an effective method of deterring crime. But Pence’s comments are not backed by scientific evidence — indeed, in states where the death penalty is used as a form of punishment for capital crimes, murder rates are actually higher than they are in states without the death penalty.

“Most experts do not believe that the death penalty or the carrying out of executions serve as deterrents to murder, nor do they believe that existing empirical research supports the deterrence theory,” Amnesty International says on its website.

It’s likely that Pence is trying to stake out a position that will make him appear “tough on crime” in an effort to court Republican voters as his campaign struggles to secure better polling numbers months before the first of many nominating contests are set to occur. Pence’s main competition in the GOP primaries, former president Donald Trump, has taken an even more extreme stance on the death penalty, suggesting that it should be used against people who are convicted of drug-related crimes.

President Joe Biden, the likely nominee for Democrats in the 2024 presidential race, said during the 2020 election that he would “pass legislation to eliminate the death penalty at the federal level, and incentivize states to follow the federal government’s example.”

Biden’s actions on abolishing the death penalty, however, have been lacking. The administration did indefinitely suspend all scheduled executions at the federal level for incarcerated people currently on death row — but activists say that more needs to be done.

“Biden has not taken steps to actually end the practice,” Alice Kim, co-director of the Justice, Policy and Culture Think Tank, wrote in an op-ed for Truthout last year. “And while federal executions have been halted for the time being, the Department of Justice has defended and sought the death penalty in the high-profile cases of Dzhokar Tsarnaev and Dylann Roof.”

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $130,000 in one-time donations and to add 1422 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy