Rep. Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) told his anxious colleagues Tuesday night that he would agree to run for speaker of the House, but only if the party united behind him by Friday.
“Our next speaker has to be a visionary one,” Ryan said after a meeting with House Republicans. “If I can truly be a unifying figure, then I will gladly serve.”
The statement could bring a possible resolution to the GOP leadership struggle that has threatened to further divide the party, but it remains unclear whether conservatives will support Ryan.
House Republicans have been in a stalemate after Speaker John A. Boehner announced he would step down and a conservative faction led by the House Freedom Caucus blocked the rise of Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California.
Ryan, a former vice presidential nominee, is considered the Republican Party’s best hope for uniting its divided House majority. But he had expressed reluctance at taking the difficult job without unanimous support.
House Republicans returned to Washington late Tuesday evening and almost immediately gathered behind closed doors over a meal of Chick-fil-A in the Capitol basement to assess the situation after a recess week away.
At that meeting, Ryan said he would be “willing to serve” if the three main GOP caucuses united around him. He also had other conditions, including that he not be required to travel as much as Boehner had so Ryan could spend time with his family.
“We have white smoke,” said Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.) as he left the closed meeting.
“He really laid out a vision … selling conservatism,” said Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.), a member of the House Freedom Caucus. Stutzman had previously backed another candidate for speaker but said he was impressed by Ryan’s approach and effort to unify the majority. “Paul Ryan was very clear it’s going to be all or nothing.”
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who had announced he would run for speaker, said Tuesday he was withdrawing from the race to back Ryan.
Ryan, who is said to be considering a future run for the presidency, was under tremendous pressure to take the job.
“My greatest worry is the consequence of not stepping up,” he said. “Our country is in desperate need of a leader.”
For more than a week, Ryan had been in a political standoff with the Freedom Caucus, a core block of conservatives who wanted changes to House rules in exchange for their support.
The caucus has enough votes to block Ryan from reaching the speaker’s gavel. But he has refused to yield to its demands to loosen control over legislative proceedings.
Ryan had met earlier in the day with a handful of members of the caucus, and he later told his colleagues that any rule changes “must be made as a team.” One of his conditions, though, is that lawmakers no longer threaten to oust the speaker with a “vacate the chair” motion — as they did with Boehner.
“No matter who is speaker, they cannot be successful with this weapon pointed at them all the time,” said Ryan’s spokesman, Brendan Buck.
The leadership drama has taken a toll on Americans’ views of the GOP majority in Congress, according to new polling.
Six in 10 Americans see the leadership battle as a “sign of dysfunction” among House Republicans, and 29% see it as a “healthy debate,” according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll. Among Republicans, more than 40% view it as a sign of dysfunction.
The leadership struggle has stymied the fall agenda and is complicating the next must-pass item: legislation to raise the federal debt limit to continue paying the nation’s bills and avoid a credit default. The Treasury Department has set a Nov. 3 deadline.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) sought to shield his chamber from the disarray across the Capitol, suggesting that Senate Republicans remain focused on a “right-of-center agenda” even with the partisan divide posed by a Democratic president in the White House.
“You have to deal with the government you have,” McConnell said. “We’re here in the Senate to do serious things for the American people.”
Ryan received a partial endorsement Tuesday from one unlikely source, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the minority leader. But such a nod might hurt more than it helps.
“He appears to be one of the few people over there who would be reasonable,” Reid said. “I mean look at some of the other people.”
Reid added that he’s no fan of Ryan’s ideology or his proposals for cutting Medicare and other safety net programs. He shrugged when asked whether his backing could doom Ryan’s candidacy.
“I speak the truth,” Reid said. “If it helps him, fine. If it doesn’t, too bad.”
Boehner, who had hoped to retire Oct. 30 from representing his Ohio district, has said he will remain in office until a new speaker is chosen.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.