Skip to content Skip to footer

One Group Obama’s Kept His Promises to: Native Americans

Washington – Speaking to 500 people representing 320 tribes, President Barack Obama pledged last month that he wouldn’t forget his campaign trail promise to give native communities a greater voice in the White House. “I said that so long as I held this office, never again would Native Americans be forgotten or ignored,” he said. “And over the past two years, my administration, working hand in hand with many of you, has strived to keep that promise.”

Washington – Speaking to 500 people representing 320 tribes, President Barack Obama pledged last month that he wouldn’t forget his campaign trail promise to give native communities a greater voice in the White House.

“I said that so long as I held this office, never again would Native Americans be forgotten or ignored,” he said. “And over the past two years, my administration, working hand in hand with many of you, has strived to keep that promise.”

For the most part, tribal leaders say the president has been true to his word. And they’ve been watching, intent on holding accountable the president that many of them helped elect, said Jacqueline Johnson Pata, executive director of the National Congress of American Indians. They took careful notes during the president’s first Tribal Nations conference in 2009; at Obama’s second summit last month, they checked to see what goals had been met in the first year as well as what remains undone.

“There is this feeling that there is traction, that we’re having a true dialogue,” Johnson Pata said. “We’re not saying, ‘Check the box, you totally won.’ We’re saying we’ve got a great foundation, and now we’ve got to build upon that.”

Some of the work has been symbolic — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar early in the administration restored the historic painting “Navajos Breaking Camp” in his office, after it had been mothballed during the Bush administration, for example.

But other accomplishments have had more tangible and far-reaching effects on thousands of people, including the settlement of the long-simmering Cobell lawsuit, which compensates thousands of Native Americans whose land was mismanaged while held in trust by the federal government.

There’s the passage of the Tribal Law and Order Act, which strengthens law enforcement in Indian Country. There’s the inclusion of Indian Health Service in the landmark health care law, and the $3.2 billion in stimulus spending, which went to schools, roads on tribal lands and technology upgrades in some of the poorest and most remote corners of the nation.

Now though, everyone in Indian Country is watching to see what happens next, as some of the glow wears off the early victories and the Obama administration must now turn to the hard slog of getting things done.

Some in Indian Country are skeptical — they’ve seen too many promises made and broken before, said John Poupart, president of the American Indian Policy Center in St. Paul, Minn. Also, some of the work the administration touts, such as the Cobell settlement and the Tribal Law and Order, has been in progress for years, he said, calling it “maintenance work” that the Obama administration merely completed.

“It feels hopeful,” Poupart said. “But a lot of these things are historic in nature, and it will take more than administrative measures to overcome them. We just want to see some productivity.”

Others point to what they say is a shift in tone from previous administrations. It was a major victory for indigenous people worldwide when late in 2010 the administration decided to support a United Nations declaration defending the rights of indigenous peoples, said Julia Kitka of the Alaska Federation of Natives. The U.S. voted against the declaration when the U.N. General Assembly adopted it in 2007, arguing it was incompatible with existing laws.

“The reversal of that policy and the support behind that … showcase the U.S. change in policy and what they’re doing are historic,” she said. “I would put that very much at the top of the list.”

The administration drew praise in its early days for early and high-profile American Indian appointees: Kim Teehee, the White House senior policy adviser for native affairs; Jodi Gillette, the White House associate director of intergovernmental affairs; and Yvette Roubideaux, the Indian Health Services director. The White House also moved quickly to get in place at the Interior Department Larry Echo Hawk, who as assistant secretary for Indian affairs, filled a job overseeing the Bureau of Indian Affairs that had been largely vacant during the Bush administration. The Obama administration also made a top-ranking Justice Department official a liaison to tribal governments.

“Creating a position in the White House and designating someone of stature in the Justice Department was very, very important,” said former Sen. Byron Dorgan, a Democrat from North Dakota who was among the main advocates for American Indians and Alaska Natives as chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee until his recent retirement. “It reflected the president’s interest in Native American issues. We made promises for many, many decades that we have broken. He and all of us understand the need to begin addressing that.”

Last week, Gillette shifted from her job in public engagement at the White house to the Interior Department, where she’ll be a deputy assistant secretary for policy and economic development, including ensuring the president’s initiatives are carried out. It’s a move Johnson Pata described as “a good sign, because she is a doer.”

“The work has really just begun,” Gillette said. “It’s a wonderful start, but we’re by no means finished.”

Tribal leaders already have a list ready for her. Tribes are particularly interested in energy development, said Ron Allen, tribal chairman and chief executive officer of Washington state’s Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe. They’d like to work on some relatively small changes, including how the IRS classifies tax-exempt bonds for tribal governments. They’d also like to see a renewed focus on jobs — key on reservations with as much as 60 percent unemployment.

“For the most part, our communities are in out of sight, out of mind, out of the way, not in the best locations,” he said. “That means infrastructure doesn’t reach people — everything from roads to broadband. So how are you going to be competitive to entice industry?”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.