Skip to content Skip to footer

North Carolina GOP Redraws Voting Map to Favor Lawmaker Who Switched Parties

Former Democratic Rep. Tricia Cotham will receive a 25-point swing in her favor because of Republican gerrymandering.

Rep. Tricia Cotham is pictured in her official portrait from the North Carolina General Assembly.

A state legislator in North Carolina who switched parties earlier this year will be rewarded for the action, it appears, when Republicans in the state redraw legislative boundaries in such a way that she’ll see a 25-point political swing in her favor in the 2024 elections.

State Rep. Tricia Cotham won her district in 2022 as a Democratic candidate who espoused centrist viewpoints. Her win at the time ensured that Republicans wouldn’t have a veto-proof majority in the state legislature, allowing Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper to have veto authority over far right bills that the party would pass.

However, earlier this year Cotham switched her party affiliation, giving Republicans the ability to override vetoes from Cooper, including for an anti-abortion bill that passed into law in the spring. Cotham has voted along with Republicans on some major legislation ever since then.

Newly redrawn legislative boundaries designed by GOP lawmakers for next year’s elections, introduced last week, will benefit Cotham, who likely wouldn’t have received the same outcome had she remained in office as a Democrat.

Cotham’s home district was won by President Joe Biden over former President Donald Trump by a 23-point margin that got him 61 percent votes to Trump’s 38 percent. But within the new district lines, should Cotham choose to run again, the voting margin in the realigned district would favor Trump – 50 percent to Biden’s 48 percent.

The 25-point changeup means Cotham, who would have faced difficult odds in a Democratic-leaning district as a newly announced Republican, will likely have a competitive matchup, if she decides to run for the state legislative seat again. It will, by no means, be a guaranteed win for her, but Cotham will have a much better chance in next year’s legislative race, compared to what she would have likely faced as a newly minted Republican in her former district, if the maps hadn’t been altered.

To be sure, Republicans haven’t just focused on Cotham’s district — an analysis from Duke University finds that, based on secretly drawn maps that were introduced by the GOP last week, both chambers of the state legislature will likely be won by Republicans again in 2024, based solely on how the voting blocs are redistributed. Although it’s not a certainty, Republicans could continue holding a veto-proof majority in the state legislature, too, based on the limited number of competitive districts that will exist if the maps are passed into law.

North Carolina is considered a “purple state” when it comes to statewide races, but partisan gerrymandering by Republicans has tended to benefit that party when it comes to state and federal legislative races in the Tarheel State.

Republicans haven’t been coy about their goals, when it comes to what they’re trying to do with the new maps.

“Our overarching goal in the creation of this House plan was to create Republican-leaning districts where possible … following traditional redistricting principles,” Rep. Destin Hall (R) recently said.

While Republicans are clear about their partisan objectives when it comes to drawing political boundaries, residents in the state are likely upset by yet another attempt at partisan gerrymandering. Polling in North Carolina has consistently shown that voters by wide margins want a fairer system, to allow for a more representative form of government.

A RepresentUS poll from 2021, for example, found that nearly 9 in 10 voters (89 percent) opposed partisan gerrymandering, with 81 percent in the survey saying they wanted districts to be drawn in a public and transparent way — contradicting the methods that were used to draw the most recent maps, which were done in secret and without public input of any kind.

That same poll found that 75 percent of state residents wanted the process to prohibit lawmakers from drawing districts that benefited a single political party, with 63 percent also saying that public input should be part of the process, to allow voters themselves to approve of the final outcome in some fashion. Only 22 percent of voters in the state, according to the poll, said they trusted state legislators to draw the voting maps on their own.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy