Federal regulators issued a sweeping complaint against Starbucks on Wednesday saying that the company illegally closed 23 stores which had union activity.
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) officials have ordered the company to reopen the stores and make workers whole for work missed and other costs incurred while the stores were closed. The complaint is expected to go before an administrative law judge next summer, per The New York Times.
The complaint says that Starbucks closed the stores in order to discourage or retaliate against union activity, per The Times. A large bulk of the closures came around July 2022. At least seven of the stores were already unionized. Workers have voted to unionize 370 Starbucks locations across the U.S. so far.
“This complaint is the latest confirmation of Starbucks’ determination to illegally oppose workers’ organizing,” Mari Cosgrove, Starbucks Workers United member and Starbucks worker in Seattle, said in a statement.
“It adds to the litany of complaints detailed in the company’s own report released this morning,” Cosgrove went on, referring to a report on labor relations released by the company on Wednesday. “If Starbucks is sincere in its overtures in recent days to forge a different relationship with its partners, this is exactly the kind of illegal behavior it needs to stop.”
The company responded to the complaint by saying that it regularly closes stores, and closed over 100 stores last year.
On the same day as the complaint, Starbucks released a report that was requested by shareholders that found that the company doesn’t have an “anti-union playbook,” rather chalking up the dozens of findings of federal labor law violations by the company to a lack of preparedness in response to the union campaign.
The report was prepared by Thomas Mackall, a former HR executive at food management company Sodexo, which has faced its own accusations of union busting and has also faced scrutiny in the past for profiting off of prisons, as Guardian labor reporter Michael Sainato pointed out. Mackall’s report was lightly critical of the company, saying that the anti-union campaign has still harmed workers and that the company must reframe its approach to the union.
In a statement, Starbucks Workers United said that the report showed that their fight for the union is as important as it has ever been.
“Today’s report, commissioned by and paid for by Starbucks, acknowledges deep problems in the company’s response to workers’ organizing — including firings, retaliation, store closings and withholding of benefits from unionized workers. The report shows Starbucks has a long way to go to shift policy and deconstruct the massive anti-union apparatus that remains in place and is active today,” the union said.
The union went on to say that the company should stop dragging its feet on negotiating a contract with unionized stores if it wants to prove that it is friendly to its workers and the union.
“If the company’s efforts at dialogue over the last few days are sincere, we are ready to talk. Indeed, we have always been ready,” Starbucks Workers United said. “Actions will speak louder than words.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.