On Sunday, Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley won the primary contest in Washington D.C., winning nearly double the votes secured by former President Donald Trump.
The contest is the first win for Haley in a series of primary and caucus events that have taken place so far, and is unlikely to change the trajectory of the Republican nominating process. Still, the win is historic, as it’s the first time a woman has won a GOP primary election in the history of the party, and may provide further evidence that Trump’s sizable base is dwindling by a small but significant amount.
The turnout for the primary was dismal — only 2,030 votes were cast in the mainly Democratic-leaning federal district. Of those who did vote, Haley attained 62.8 percent of support, with Trump garnering just 33.3 percent.
The winner-take-all contest allotted 19 delegates to Haley. As of Monday afternoon, the former South Carolina governor and United Nations ambassador has received 43 delegates, while Trump has collected 247 delegates so far.
For a Republican candidate to win the nomination, they must attain 1,215 delegates. Trump could come close to that total if he sweeps the “Super Tuesday” slate of 16 GOP primary states voting tomorrow. But even if he does, he’ll need a few additional states to secure the Republican Party’s presidential nomination.
After the results of the D.C. contest, both candidates’ respective spokespeople used the race’s proximity to the nation’s capital as a political talking point.
“It’s not surprising that Republicans closest to Washington dysfunction are rejecting Donald Trump and all his chaos,” said Haley spokesperson Olivia Perez-Cubas.
“While Nikki has been soundly rejected throughout the rest of America, she was just crowned Queen of the Swamp by the lobbyists and D.C. insiders that want to protect the failed status quo,” Trump press secretary Karoline Leavitt countered.
Trump weighed in on his loss to Haley on Truth Social, claiming in what appears to be sour grapes that it was the outcome he had secretly been hoping for.
“I purposely stayed away from the D.C. Vote because it is the ‘Swamp,’ with very few delegates, and no upside,” Trump claimed. “[Haley] spent all of her time, money and effort there.”
Despite Trump’s insistence that his loss was a purposeful “gimme” to Haley, there are signs that his base of support within the Republican Party is shrinking, albeit by a small portion.
Last week, for example, Trump handily won the Michigan primary race against Haley. However, 3 in 10 voters supported her and other options on the ballot, indicating that they weren’t convinced that Trump is the best choice to run as the Republican nominee for a third straight presidential election cycle.
An NORC analysis of three nominating contests before Michigan suggests that, in races where Trump hasn’t defeated Haley by larger margins, he may lose some of those voters in the general election race against incumbent President Joe Biden. According to that analysis, one in five GOP primary-goers who voted against him probably won’t vote for him in November, either, amounting to a significant portion of the electorate in a race that will likely be tight.
An inspection of data prior to those primary races by Political Wire’s Taegan Goddard noted that Trump’s polling average is higher than his electoral outcomes so far. Indeed, Michigan was the fourth straight race where Trump underperformed based on the predicted FiveThirtyEight polling averages, which “could call into question the general election polling showing him leading Biden,” Goddard said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.