Skip to content Skip to footer

New York Court Rebukes Fox News, Gives Smartmatic Lawsuit Go-Ahead to Proceed

Fox News “effectively endorsed and participated in” defamation against the voting systems company, the court said.

A New York state appellate court ruled on Tuesday that a lawsuit against Fox News brought by voting systems company Smartmatic USA can proceed, rejecting calls from the cable network for the case to be dismissed.

Smartmatic is seeking $2.7 billion in damages from Fox News, its hosts and guests who alleged or insinuated the company had engaged in election fraud in order to help President Joe Biden win the 2020 presidential election against former President Donald Trump. The news station regularly featured guests with questionable claims regarding the integrity of the election, with hosts also parroting those allegations as, at the very least, meriting consideration.

Allegations of election fraud affecting the outcome of that race, made by numerous allies of Trump and by Trump himself, have never been proven true, with most claims having been debunked outright, including by a research group hired by the Trump campaign.

In seeking a dismissal of the suit, Fox News tried to argue that it should be protected by the First Amendment journalism protections established in the Constitution, and that it was duty-bound to report on claims of fraud, even if they were false.

The five-judge panel in the Appellate Division Court in Manhattan unanimously ruled against those assertions, noting that the news organization, its anchors and guests “effectively endorsed and participated in (defamation) with reckless disregard for, or serious doubts about” whether Smartmatic engaged in fraud that affected the outcome of the election.

Indeed, as hosts and guests repeatedly claimed Smartmatic affected the election outcome throughout the U.S., the company noted within the lawsuit that its machines were only used in Los Angeles County, California. Claims of machines engaging in “vote-switching” were also meritless, the court found.

In addition to Fox News itself, the lawsuit names as defendants host Maria Bartiromo and former host Lou Dobbs. The state appellate court also ruled that previous lower court rulings removing other individuals that Smartmatic sought to include in the lawsuit — including former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and host Jeanine Pirro — were improperly made, and reinstated them into the lawsuit. The court removed Fox News’s parent company, Fox Corp from the lawsuit.

Giuliani, who spouted errant and misleading claims of election fraud in any and every forum he was allowed to participate in after Trump’s loss, was on the receiving end of a different judge’s ire in a separate ruling involving the lawsuit last year. The former mayor of New York “acted with actual malice” in disseminating false fraud claims against Smartmatic, that judge said in March, adding that Fox News and its hosts had also “turned a blind eye” to “outrageous claims” anchors and guests were making about the company, which were “so inherently improbable that it evinced a reckless disregard for the truth.”

While Giuliani and others were happy to push false claims of election fraud in public settings, in court, however, while under oath, they rarely echoed those same fraud allegations, stating instead that alleged discrepancies in voting behaviors warranted the complete overturning of the results in numerous states, actions that would have resulted in Trump remaining in office, if they had been accepted.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 3 days to add 280 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.