Skip to content Skip to footer

New York Court of Appeals Rejects Trump Request to Lift Gag Order

Trump’s demand to lift the gag order contained “no substantial constitutional question,” the court found.

Former President Donald Trump speaks to members of the Club 47 group at the Palm Beach Convention Center on June 14, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Florida.

The New York Court of Appeals, the state of New York’s highest court, has rejected an appeal from former President Donald Trump to lift the gag order imposed on him in his Manhattan-based criminal trial.

Trump was found guilty on May 30 of 34 felony-level counts relating to his concealing hush-money payments to women with whom he had extramarital affairs ahead of the 2016 presidential election season.

During the trial, Justice Juan Merchan, the judge overseeing its proceedings, imposed a gag order on the former president, limiting what he could say publicly about jurors, potential witnesses, the prosecution’s staff, court staff or the family members of those staffers. He was still allowed to criticize the trial itself, and wasn’t restricted from making public comments against District Attorney Alvin Bragg or Merchan.

Although the trial is now over, Trump is set to be sentenced on July 11. The gag order is still in effect at least until that time, but could last longer if Trump makes an appeal, which he has promised to pursue.

Trump violated the gag order 10 times and was fined $1,000 for each instance. He was also warned by Merchan that any further violations of the order could result in jail time, a possibility Trump had suggested he would purposely pursue as a “sacrifice” to protect the Constitution and his free speech rights.

Gag orders are not unusual in criminal trials, especially when the words or actions of a person involved could influence the outcome of a case.

Trump’s lawyers appealed the gag order, but the trial was allowed to continue while that process played out. In May, a state appellate court ruled against Trump, finding that Merchan had properly “weighed [Trump’s] First Amendment Rights against the court’s historical commitment to ensuring the fair administration of justice in criminal cases and the right of persons related or tangentially related to the criminal proceedings from being free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm.”

That ruling was then appealed to the state Court of Appeals, which on Tuesday stated in a brief order that it was refusing to entertain the notion, allowing the lower court ruling to stand. In doing so, the Court of Appeals said that “no substantial constitutional question is directly involved” within Trump’s argument to lift the gag order.

Trump’s continued losses in the court case could hurt him politically, much more so than any gag order against him. Indeed, aggregate polling data collected by FiveThirtyEight shows that Trump’s support has dipped slightly since the guilty verdict.

According to an average of polls, Trump had a 1.7-point lead over incumbent President Joe Biden the day the verdict was read. As of Tuesday, that lead has diminished, to a 0.6-point lead over Biden.

Observing this trend, the Biden campaign has paid for a major commercial that highlights Trump’s conviction within the first few seconds. The $50 million ad will air primarily in swing states.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.