Skip to content Skip to footer

A Win for Net Neutrality Activists: First House Republican Backs Effort to Reinstate Protections

Mike Coffman is the first House Republican to sign a petition to force a vote on reinstating net neutrality.

Demonstrators rally outside the Federal Communication Commission building to protest against the end of net neutrality rules December 14, 2017, in Washington, DC.

“The dam is breaking, as it should.” That’s how Faiz Shakir, the ACLU’s national political director, responded on Tuesday after Rep. Mike Coffman of Colorado became the first House Republican to sign a petition to force a vote on a measure that would reinstate net neutrality protections that the GOP-controlled Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rolled back in December.

“Rep. Coffman’s support to undo FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s repeal of net neutrality shows that public pressure is continuing to build on this issue and cannot be ignored this November,” Shakir added. “Other House members should take heed of Coffman’s direction and stand by the overwhelming majority of their constituents, not corporate interests.”

While several states have taken steps to protect net neutrality at a local level, the coalition of consumer advocacy and free speech groups fighting Pai’s repeal plan, which officially took effect last month, has rallied behind a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution that would override the FCC’s vote. Led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), the Senate narrowly approved the resolution in May.

However, Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan has refused to bring the resolution to the floor, even though Americans across the political spectrum overwhelmingly opposed the FCC’s vote to kill net neutrality protections. If enough GOP lawmakers back a discharge petition, though, they could force a vote. Advocates welcomed Coffman’s decision as a vital step toward convincing more Republicans to support the petition and the resolution.

As Markey put it: “The tide is turning. The pressure is mounting. The floodgates are open.”

“By supporting this measure, Congressman Coffman is putting the interests of his constituents and the American people ahead of monopoly cable and telecommunications providers,” declared former FCC commissioner and current Common Cause special adviser Michael Copps. “We urge Congressman Coffman’s Republican colleagues to follow his lead and sign the discharge petition to restore net neutrality. It’s the right thing to do.”

Net neutrality supporters continue to organize events across the country to pressure lawmakers to act.

While Coffman also introduced new net neutrality legislation on Tuesday, Free Press Action Fund government relations director Sandra Fulton said it “is highly unlikely” that his his 21st Century Internet Act is somehow stronger than the rules rolled back by the FCC.

“And no matter how weak or strong Coffman’s new bill is on paper, it has no chance of passing in this Congress,” Fulton concluded. “The CRA is the best and only chance legislators have to restore these crucial rights this year.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy