The case of the missing indictment for the three NATO protesters charged with terrorism has been solved by the group’s lawyers, who discovered the documents at the Cook County Court clerk’s office and released them Wednesday.
Lawyers of the NATO 3 were initially denied access to the charges, which include material support for terrorism, possession of an incendiary device, conspiracy to commit terrorism, solicitation to commit arson, attempted arson and two counts of unlawful use of a weapon. The newly released documents show each activist with 11 felony charges each, more than was originally assumed.
“The fact that the indictment charges the defendants with 11 serious felonies, including ‘terrorism’ and two separate ‘conspiracy’ charges for the alleged possession of 4 makeshift incendiary devices shows that the State is intent on continuing its strategy to sensationalize this case,” said attorney Michael Deutsch with the People’s Law Office and the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), in a press release. “The prosecutor controls the grand jury and is able to obtain a rubber-stamped indictment for any charges it desires.”
The case against Brent Betterly, Jared Chase and Brian Jacob Church, who are in jail on a $1.5 million bond each, was marred by a lack of information from its inception. Deutsch was denied a copy of the indictment – in response, prosecutors said they were not legally obligated to provide it before the arraignment hearing.
In response to Deutsch being denied a copy of the indictment, Judge Adam Bourgeois Jr. said at a hearing last week: “It seems a little strange, but that’s the way it is.”
In addition, prosecutors have not shared evidence regarding alleged materials to make firebombs found in the raided apartment, according to defense attorneys of the detained activists.
The State’s Attorney’s office did not respond to requests for comment.
Church, Chase and Betterly, who were arrested in May during an undercover operation and were said to have been planning an arson attack on Obama’s campaign headquarters, could spend years in jail while the case makes its way through the courts.
“The common thread running through the NATO 3 case and other similar contemporary cases is politically motivated infiltration,” said NLG spokesperson Kris Hermes. “Given that no Molotov cocktails or other incendiary devices have been used at any political demonstration in the U.S. in recent memory, questions of whether law enforcement is in fact provoking or manufacturing criminal activity remain unanswered and extremely relevant.”
The three NATO defendants were arrested along with eight others only days before the NATO summit in May during a raid on the home of two Occupy Chicago activists. They were then held for up to 68 hours before receiving their charges; of the eleven arrested at the house, five continue to be held and the rest were released.
Among those arrested during the home raid were two undercover police officers – “Mo” and “Gloves” – both of whom, it was subsequently revealed, had been infiltrating Occupy Chicago for months prior to the protests.
The case of the NATO 3 is the first time the state’s attorney’s office has prosecuted under the Illinois terrorism statute, say defense lawyers, but the pattern of entrapment isn’t new to Occupy.
Hermes cites the case of the Cleveland 5, Occupy activists with federal terrorism and explosive charges who commentators say were led on by active infiltration.
Hermes says that the short-term goal of the city “which was to discredit the NATO demonstrators and perhaps diminish the number of people on the streets protesting” was achieved by the arrest of the NATO 3.
But, he continued, “Unfortunately now these three men are paying the price … and remain the unfortunate consequence of the city’s desire to create hysteria around so-called terrorism charges.”
Occupy groups around the country are calling for an international day in solidarity with the detained NATO protesters for July 2, the day of the arraignment. Hermes said the three will plead “not guilty.”
“There are real questions whether these crimes are being manufactured,” said Hermes, “and whether they would happen at all if they didn’t involve state actors.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy