On Monday, the Manhattan District Attorney’s office began presenting evidence to a grand jury regarding hush money payments made by the Trump Organization to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
The grand jury was recently established, and will advise District Attorney Alvin Bragg over whether Trump or other individuals involved in the payments should be charged for falsifying business records in order to conceal Trump’s relationship with Daniels.
Around $130,000 in payments were made to Daniels in late 2016 to ensure that she would keep silent about Trump’s extramarital affair with her, which, if divulged during the presidential campaign season, could have harmed his chances of winning the election against then-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.
Trump’s personal lawyer at the time, Michael Cohen, has pleaded guilty to federal charges relating to those payments; in 2018, Cohen said that he facilitated the payments “at the direction of a candidate for federal office,” referring to Trump. In exchange for this service, the Trump Organization arranged to pay him $420,000, describing the payment as “legal fees,” which could constitute a crime under New York state law.
It is a felony to falsify business records in the state. A person found guilty of doing so faces up to four years in prison.
According to reporting from The New York Times, the case is considered a long shot, as it is dependent on an “untested legal theory” that might be difficult to prove. But prosecutors have taken a more aggressive approach in recent days, including contacting members of the Trump Organization, the Trump 2016 presidential campaign, and staff from The National Enquirer, which reportedly helped facilitate the hush money arrangement with Daniels.
At least one witness is believed to have met with the grand jury so far: David Pecker, the former publisher of The National Enquirer, was seen on Monday entering the building where the grand jury is convening. CNN also reported that Pecker had met with prosecutors that day.
The impaneling of a grand jury was somewhat surprising, as around a year ago, it appeared that the investigation was becoming dormant. At the time, sources told several media publications that Bragg appeared “disinterested” in the case and expressed doubts over the direction it was going in. His slowing-down of the inquiry led two lawyers in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office to abruptly resign in protest.
Trump responded to the re-amping up of the case in a post on his Truth Social website that also referenced the case in Georgia examining his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and the special counsel investigation examining his removal of documents from the White House when he left office.
This and other inquiries are only happening to please the “Fake News Media and the Democrat [sic] Party,” Trump said, adding that he also believed the investigations were happening because he is “leading by sooo much” in polls for the 2024 presidential election.
Trump’s polling numbers aren’t as good as he claims, however. An aggregate of polling data collected by RealClearPolitics shows that he’s behind President Joe Biden in a hypothetical rematch by around 1.2 points, on average. Support for him running for president (for a third time in as many presidential election cycles) is even worse: According to an Economist/YouGov poll published just last week, barely over a quarter of Americans (27 percent) said he should run, while 57 percent said they didn’t want him to.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.