Skip to content Skip to footer

Manchin Joins Republican Senators to Block Abortion Rights Bill

“The public will not forget” who opposed the legislation, Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski talks with Sen. Joe Manchin outside the Senate Chamber at the U.S. Capitol on April 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C.

A bill that would have recognized and protected abortion rights across the United States, codifying many aspects of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision on abortion, failed to garner enough votes for passage in the Senate on Wednesday.

The vote was expected to fail due to the high likelihood that it would be filibustered by Republicans. In the end, the bill failed to garner even 50 votes from senators.

Forty-nine Democratic senators voted for the bill, while 50 Republicans, plus Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, voted against the legislation.

Vice President Kamala Harris presided over the vote. Before the roll call was taken, Democratic lawmakers from the House had marched from their chamber to the Senate, chanting “My body, my choice” to encourage a vote affirming the legislation they had previously passed.

The vote was held in response to a draft opinion from the Supreme Court that was leaked earlier this month, in which five conservative justices, constituting a majority, signaled support for overturning the nearly 50-year precedent of abortion rights protections that were established in Roe.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York), speaking before the vote took place, acknowledged the likely outcome, but noted that the vote would demonstrate to Americans exactly where their elected senators stand on the bill.

“The public will not forget which side of the vote senators fall on today, they will not forget who voted to protect their freedoms, and they will not forget those responsible for the greatest backslide of individual liberties in half a century,” he predicted.

In a statement that was issued after the vote, President Joe Biden blasted the Senate’s “failure to act” on protecting “constitutional rights” to abortion access.

“To protect the right to choose, voters need to elect more pro-choice senators this November, and return a pro-choice majority to the House,” he added. “If they do, Congress can pass this bill in January, and put it on my desk, so I can sign it into law.”

Schumer also warned voters that if they elected “more MAGA Republicans” — that is, lawmakers who are strongly aligned with former Republican President Donald Trump — they would likely see a nationwide ban on abortion in the next legislative session.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) has indeed signaled that his party is headed in that direction, noting that a national ban on the medical procedure could be “possible” if Republicans take control of Congress.

“If the leaked opinion became the final opinion, legislative bodies — not only at the state level but at the federal level — certainly could legislate in that area,” McConnell said last week. “And if this were the final decision, that was the point that it should be resolved one way or another in the legislative process. So yeah, it’s possible.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.