United States Sen. Steve Daines (R-Montana) has made an unusual and absurd argument in favor of allowing abortion rights across the country to be dismantled through a future Supreme Court ruling, using environmental protections for sea turtles and eagles to make his case.
Daines spoke on the Senate floor on Tuesday to compare those environmental standards to abortion protections, arguing against a bill set to be considered on Wednesday that would codify reproductive rights that were recognized in the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade. The bill, which is in response to a leaked draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito suggesting that the Court will soon overturn that precedent, is not expected to pass.
The Montana Republican’s argument rested on the notion that wildlife had more protections than human embryos — disregarding the autonomy rights of individuals altogether.
“Why do we have laws in place that protect the eggs of a sea turtle, or the eggs of eagles?” Daines questioned rhetorically in his complaint. “Because when you destroy an egg, you’re killing a pre-born baby sea turtle or a pre-born baby eagle. Yet when it comes to a pre-born human baby — rather than a sea turtle — that baby would be stripped of all protections, in all 50 states, under the Democrats’ bill that we’ll be voting on.”
Daines on Abortion: Why do we have laws in place to protect the eggs of a sea turtle or the eggs of eagles… pic.twitter.com/yr0dM7aaAs
— Acyn (@Acyn) May 10, 2022
There are many serious problems, of course, with Daines’s reasoning. For starters, the destruction of another animal’s eggs or offspring in this instance is an action performed by a human being, and the laws he cites are about restricting humans from engaging in actions that could destroy entire species. Meanwhile, abortion is a decision that is made by an individual who is pregnant themselves, who no longer wants to be, a decision that respects their own personal autonomy.
Daines is also hypocritical in his statement — while he uses the protection of certain animals to defend his stance against abortion rights, the senator has regularly promoted legislation that would threaten endangered animals’ lives.
Many people on social media also noted Daines’s problematic arguments against keeping the right to abortion across the entirety of the U.S. intact.
“Can someone explain to Sen. Daines that women don’t lay eggs?” tweeted Laura Dronen, communications director for North Dakota Democratic-Nonpartisan League Party.
“Shocking no one, Sen. Steve Daines bio says he’s an avid hunter who kills birds,” noted Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand. “What do you want to bet he also eats eggs?”
Political commentator Lindy Li also tweeted about Daines’s comments, enjoining them to a number of other preposterous remarks anti-abortion conservatives have made in the past week or so.
“Montana Senator Daines compares women to sea turtles. [Ohio GOP Senate candidate] JD Vance says rape is ‘inconvenient.’ Alito thinks we’re host bodies that produce for the ‘domestic supply of infants.’ [Ohio Republican] Rep. Jean Schmidt says rape is an opportunity. The misogyny of the GOP isn’t a bug. It’s the whole shebang,” Li said.
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we have just 8 days left to raise $47,000 in critical funds.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?