A measure to loosen abortion restrictions in Maine has advanced within the state legislature, with both houses voting on the proposal potentially as soon as this week.
The measure — which was proposed by Democratic Gov. Janet Mills and passed by the state legislature’s joint judiciary committee — will allow abortions in certain circumstances, with a physician’s approval, beyond the state’s current timeline.
The measure passed by a 7-3 vote on Friday. The bill now advances to each house of the state legislature, both of which are controlled by Democrats. The bill is likely to pass both houses and become law upon reaching Mills’s desk.
Currently, state law restricts abortions beyond viability, usually viewed as the 24th week of pregnancy by the state’s standards, unless a pregnant person’s life is at risk. Under the new bill, however, exceptions can be made whenever a physician deems an abortion medically necessary, removing any ambiguities over whether the procedure meets a “life-saving” threshold or not.
Such ambiguities in statutes elsewhere in the country have resulted in physicians becoming reluctant to provide abortions, even in circumstances in which the fetus is no longer viable and the pregnant person’s health is in grave danger. Such a case made national headlines in Tennessee, for instance, when a woman who needed abortion care was denied access to the procedure, resulting in her health deteriorating so badly that she was eventually forced to undergo emergency surgery that included getting a hysterectomy she didn’t want.
Anti-abortion activists have rallied against the Maine bill, with many voicing disdain over its loosening of abortion restrictions at a hearing in May. Republicans in the state legislature are also vehemently opposed to the potentially lifesaving bill, claiming in a recent statement that the proposal is too extreme.
The governor has rejected those viewpoints, however. Just before the hearing last month, Mills defended the new proposal, denouncing the current law as “extreme” because it forces a person “to become dangerously ill” before they can terminate pregnancies that are likely non-viable.
Abortion advocates celebrated the bill’s advancement last week.
“Abortion is HEALTH CARE and you can’t put an arbitrary timestamp on getting the help you need,” wrote the Twitter account for the nonprofit group Abortion Access Front.
And in a recent news report from WMTW out of Portland, Maine, Nicole Clegg, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, rejected the premise from anti-abortionists that the measure went too far.
“This isn’t radical. This is about recognizing that pregnancy is a complicated physical experience, and there are lots of circumstances that our laws don’t account for right now,” Clegg said. “It’s about providing that care.”
Our most important fundraising appeal of the year
December is the most critical time of year for Truthout, because our nonprofit news is funded almost entirely by individual donations from readers like you. So before you navigate away, we ask that you take just a second to support Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.
This year is a little different. We are up against a far-reaching, wide-scale attack on press freedom coming from the Trump administration. 2025 was a year of frightening censorship, news industry corporate consolidation, and worsening financial conditions for progressive nonprofits across the board.
We can only resist Trump’s agenda by cultivating a strong base of support. The right-wing mediasphere is funded comfortably by billionaire owners and venture capitalist philanthropists. At Truthout, we have you.
We’ve set an ambitious target for our year-end campaign — a goal of $250,000 to keep up our fight against authoritarianism in 2026. Please take a meaningful action in this fight: make a one-time or monthly donation to Truthout before December 31. If you have the means, please dig deep.