Skip to content Skip to footer

Lawmakers to Question Executive of New Jersey’s Controversial Student Loan Agency

A ProPublica and New York Times investigation has prompted a state Senate hearing on aggressive collection practices.

The New Jersey State Senate has announced it will hold a hearing to examine the state’s student loan agency, which administers the largest state-based loan program in the country and one that employs aggressive and unforgiving collection practices.

A ProPublica and New York Times investigation has shown that New Jersey’s loan program charges higher interest rates than similar federal programs, and that its officials, armed with the power of the state, have garnished wages, rescinded tax refunds, and even sought repayment from families whose children have died. The state’s student loans now total $1.9 billion.

The hearing, set for Aug. 8, will be led by New Jersey state Sen. Robert Gordon, chairman of the Legislative Oversight Committee, and New Jersey state Sen. Sandra Cunningham, chairwoman of the Higher Education Committee.

“We need to be sure we are properly advising prospective borrowers and not aggressively targeting students and families that are having financial difficulties,” Gordon said in an emailed release. “The state should be supporting students and young workers in particular, not putting up additional barriers to their future success.”

Following the hearing, the Senate Higher Education Committee is expected to consider a bill that would direct the state loan agency to forgive student loans following the death of a borrower.

As ProPublica has detailed, repayments on New Jersey’s loans cannot be adjusted based on income, and borrowers are given few breaks, even when facing the loss of jobs, disability or death. One mother who cosigned on her son’s loans is continuing to pay off his debt, even after he was murdered. A college graduate, who defaulted on his loans after he was diagnosed with cancer and lost his job, was sued by the state agency for more than $250,000.

The agency’s collection powers exceed those of the most predatory for-profit lenders, and even the agency’s most aggressive collection tactics do not require court approval. After default, the agency cuts off contact with borrowers, sending their accounts to collection firms that can tack on an extra 30 percent in attorney fees. Over the past five years, the agency has demonstrated a greater willingness to pursue borrowers through court action. In 2010, the agency filed fewer than 100 lawsuits against borrowers and their cosigners; last year, it filed over 1,600.

New Jersey funds its loan program through tax-exempt bonds that require the agency, the Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, or HESAA, to keep losses to a minimum.

“Were HESAA not to utilize the tools provided by the legislature we would not be fulfilling our statutory requirements or our fiduciary duties to our bondholders,” said the agency’s Chief of Staff Marcia Karrow. (Read the agency’s responses to our previous questions). The agency did not respond to request for comment on the upcoming hearing.

The agency says it has programs to help struggling borrowers. But as ProPublica reported last week, staffers at the agency have been instructed to only tell borrowers about the programs if they know to ask about them.

Borrowers and an executive from the state student loan agency are expected to testify at the hearing, which is scheduled for 1 p.m. in Committee Room 4 of the New Jersey State House in Trenton.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.