On Sunday, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colorado) said that Republican lawmakers would pursue changes to federal elections law to impose term limits on members of Congress, an action that would curtail the rights of U.S. voters.
“The 118th Congress WILL vote on Term Limits for lawmakers. After years and years of talk, we’ll finally see where people truly stand on this issue,” Boebert tweeted on Sunday afternoon. She did not say what she believes the term limit should be, however.
On Monday morning, Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky) said during a Fox News interview that he also hoped for a vote on the issue, claiming it was one that his constituents were “most excited” to see.
“This is something that Republicans campaign on every election, but yet we haven’t had a term limits vote in the six years I’ve been in Congress,” Comer said.
Polling shows that most Americans support the idea of term limits; in a Reuters/Ipsos poll published in November, 79 percent of respondents agreed that members of Congress should be limited to a certain number of years in office. Still, the concept is inherently anti-democratic, as it limits voters’ ability to decide who they want to represent them.
According to a 2018 analysis from The Brookings Institution, term limits remove power from voters and prevent them from voting for lawmakers who have already earned their trust.
Term limits also make it more difficult for lawmakers to effectively work on behalf of constituents’ interests — having a new influx of elected leaders every few years means that inexperienced lawmakers have to learn the process of legislating upon taking office. “Crafting legislative proposals is a learned skill; as in other professions, experience matters,” Brookings noted, adding that “the public is not best served if inexperienced members are making policy choices with widespread, lasting effects.”
Though rooting out corruption is one of the primary justifications for promoting term limits, corruption often takes place when lawmakers are inexperienced. “Novice legislators will look to fill their own informational and policy gaps by an increased reliance on special interests and lobbyists,” Brookings pointed out.
In response to Boebert’s tweet, one Twitter user pointed out the issues that arose when term limits were introduced at the state level in Michigan.
“I had an opportunity to vote for term limits in Michigan and I supported it,” wrote Douglas Allen Arenberg, a professor of pulmonary diseases at the University of Michigan. “I regret it now. What you have now are inexperienced people with no reason to even try to work with one another. It has resulted in legislative paralysis best, and outright stupidity at worst.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy